Phonological skills of a native Nepali speaking preschooler with developmental speech sound disorder
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20253794Keywords:
Speech sound disorder, Nepali phonology, Rhotics, Retroflex, Velar neutralization, Stimulability, IntelligibilityAbstract
Speech sound disorder (SSD) is a common developmental difficulty in children, yet its manifestation in Nepali remains underexplored. Owing to the language’s unique phonological structure, including retroflex–dental contrasts, aspirated stops, and rhotic trills or flaps, speech errors are expected to differ from those reported in English. This case study describes the phonological profile of a 5;0-year-old Nepali-speaking child with SSD. Speech samples were collected through picture naming and sentence imitation tasks (152 tokens, 98 words), transcribed in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), and analyzed for error patterns, stimulability, consistency, whole-word accuracy, and intelligibility. The child’s speech revealed a systematic but restricted phonological system: the rhotic/r/ was consistently replaced by (/rukʰ/“tree” → [lukʰ],/ɡʱar/“house”→[ɡʱal]); retroflexes were neutralized into dentals (/t̠opi/“cap”→[t̪opi],/t̠ʰulo/“big” →[t̪ulo]); and velars were substituted by dental counterparts (/kamila/“ant”→[t̪amila],/kʰarajo/“hare”→[t̪arayo]). None of these sounds were stimulable despite repeated cueing, with 85% consistency in errors, whole-word accuracy of 0.68, and connected-speech intelligibility rated 3/5. These results indicate a systematic reorganization of the phonological system, marked by the loss of major contrasts and reduced intelligibility. The lack of stimulability highlights the need for direct motor-based therapy, while the findings emphasize the importance of developing Nepali-specific assessment frameworks for accurate diagnosis and intervention.
Metrics
References
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Speech sound disorders: Articulation and phonology. 2020. Available at: https://www.asha. org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/articulation-and-phonology/. Accessed on 20 August 2025.
Dodd B, Holm A, Hua Z, Crosbie S. Phonological development: A normative study of British English-speaking children. Clin Linguistics Phonetics. 2003;17(8):617-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0269920031000111348
Preston JL, Edwards ML. Phonological processing skills of adolescents with residual speech sound errors. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 2010;41(4):401-13.
Ball MJ, Müller N. Phonetics for communication disorders. 1st edition. London: Routledge. 2005.
Vihman MM. Phonological development: The first two years. 2nd edition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260997
Eberhard DM, Simons GF, Fennig CD, editors. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 25th edition. Dallas: SIL International. 2022.
Khatiwada R. Nepali. J Int Phonetic Assoc. 2009;39(3):373-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100309990181
Bharadwaj S, Sushma B, Sreedevi N. Speech intelligibility of Kannada-speaking children. J India Inst Speech Hearing. 2010;29:69-77.
Miccio AW. Clinical problem solving: Assessment of phonological disorders. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2002;11(3):221-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2002/023)
Shriberg LD, Lof GL. Reliability studies in broad and narrow phonetic transcription. Clin Linguistics Phonetics. 1991;5(3):225-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209108986113
Bleile KM. Manual of articulation and phonological disorders: Infancy through adulthood. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group. 1995.
Ingram D. The measurement of whole-word productions. J Child Language. 2002;29(4):713-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000902005275
Bowen C. Practical phonetics and phonology. London: Whurr. 1998.
Coplan J, Gleason JR. Unclear speech: Recognition and significance of unintelligible speech in preschool children. Pediatrics. 1988;82(3 Pt 2):447-52.
Hustad KC, Sakash A, Bredin-Oja SL, Natzke P. Longitudinal growth in speech intelligibility of children with typical development: Predicting developmental benchmarks. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021;64(7):2565-77.
McLeod S, Crowe K. Children’s consonant acquisition in 27 languages: A cross-linguistic review. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2018;27(4):1546-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0100
Jiménez BC. Acquisition of Spanish consonants in children aged 3–5 years, 7 months. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1987;18(4):357-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.1804.357
Shoukath A. Malayalam retroflexes: Markedness in consonant distribution. J Emer Technol Innov Res. 2018;19:1-10.
Perumal RC, Raghunathan V, Boominathan P, Sreedevi N. Phonological processes in typically developing Tamil-speaking children. Lang India. 2017;17(7):1-23.
Sreedevi N, Smitha KN, Vikas MD. Frequency of occurrence of phonemes in Kannada: A preliminary study. J India Ins Speech Hear. 2012;31:40-6.
Sreedevi N, Irfana M, Paulson AR. Frequency of occurrence of phonemes in Hindi. Parole: J Lingu Edu. 2022;12(2):253-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v12i2.253-260
Mathur P, Banik A. Development of phonological processes in typically developing Hindi-speaking children (3½–6½ years). Int J Applied Res. 2016;2(7):792-6.
Kaur R, Rao TAS. Descriptive analyses of phonological development in typically developing Hindi-speaking children. Lang India. 2015;15(5):235-55.
Srilakshmi P. Phonological processes in 4.6 to 5.5 years old Telugu-speaking children. Afr J Biomed Res. 2005;8(2):147-53.
Sujjuri Alagendraraja R, Samayan K. Phonological processes in 4.6–5.5-year-old Tamil-Telugu bilingual children. Afr J Biomed Res. 2024;27:3420-9.