Comparative study about early full versus conventional partial enteral feeding in preterm new-born infants of 28-34 weeks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20250100Keywords:
Breastfeeding, Necrotizing colitis, Enteral breastfeeding, Infant growthAbstract
Background: Enteral feeding is a critical component of neonatal care for preterm infants. Enteral feeding is indicated for a range of medical conditions, including prematurity, where infants cannot suck and swallow effectively; neurological disorders such as cerebral palsy or brain injuries; congenital anomalies like cleft palate; and critical illnesses that prevent adequate oral intake. This study aims to evaluate and compare the outcomes of early full enteral feeding with conventional partial enteral feeding in preterm newborn infants born between 28 and 34 weeks of gestation, focusing on parameters such as growth and development, long term morbidity and mortality.
Methods: This is a comparative prospective observational study designed to compare full enteral feeding with partial feeding on preterm. Total 180 preterm infants were included in the study. Participants were allocated into two groups - 90 preterm: full feed, and 90 preterm: partially feed.
Results: A study of 180 infants compared full and partial feeding groups, each with 90 babies. The full-feeding group showed fewer complications (16% total) with no necrotizing colitis, while the partial-feeding group had more issues (30.33% total), including 3% with necrotizing colitis. Full-fed babies had better outcomes with higher discharge rates (88% versus 80%) and lower death rates (9% versus 15%). While both groups showed similar length growth, full-fed babies maintained more stable weight gain over 15 days.
Conclusions: This study concludes that full enteral feeding is more beneficial approach in the nutritional management of preterm infants leading to improved growth in terms of weight, length and head circumference gain.
Metrics
References
Berghella V. Preterm birth: Prevention and management. 1st Edition. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444317619
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. GBD Results. Available at: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool. Accessed on 23 May 2024.
Dutta S, Singh B, Chessell L, Wilson J, Janes M, McDonald K, et al. Guidelines for feeding very low birth weight infants. Nutrients. 2015;7(1):423-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7010423
SIFT Investigators Group. Early enteral feeding strategies for very preterm infants: current evidence from Cochrane reviews. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013;98(6):F470-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2012-303260
World Health Organization. WHO Technical Review on Optimal Feeding of Low Birth Weight Infants. Available at: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/ 10665/43602/9789241595094%20_eng.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed on 23 May 2024.
Kleinman RE, Greer FR, editors. Paediatric Nutrition. 8th Edition. American Academy of Pediatrics. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/9781610023610
Chitale R, Ferguson K, Talej M, Yang WC, He S, Edmond KM, et al. Early Enteral Feeding for Preterm or Low Birth Weight Infants: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2022;150(1):e2022057092E. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2022-057092E
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Neonatal parenteral nutrition. 2020. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ ng154. Accessed on 23 May 2024.
Abiramalatha T, Thomas N, Thanigainathan S. High versus standard volume enteral feeds to promote growth in preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;3(3):CD012413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012413.pub3
Walsh V, Brown JVE, Copperthwaite BR, Oddie SJ, McGuire W. Early full enteral feeding for preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;12(12):CD013542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013542.pub2
Young L, Oddie SJ, McGuire W. Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;1(1):CD001970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001970.pub6
Kennedy KA, Tyson JE, Chamnanvanikij S. Early versus delayed initiation of progressive enteral feedings for parenterally fed low birth weight or preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001970
Nangia S, Bishnoi A, Goel A, Mandal P, Tiwari S, Saili A. Early Total Enteral Feeding in Stable Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Before and After Study. J Trop Pediatr. 2018;64(1):24-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmx023
Thoene M, Anderson-Berry A. Early Enteral Feeding in Preterm Infants: A Narrative Review of the Nutritional, Metabolic, and Developmental Benefits. Nutrients. 2021;13(7):2289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13072289
Terefe A, Demtse A, Abebe F, Mislu E, Tachbele E. Predictors of time to full enteral feeding in low birth weight neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care unit: a prospective follow up study. BMC Pediatr. 2024;24(1):64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-04545-0
Liu K, Abudusalamu A, Yang J, Su Y. Effectiveness of early enteral feeding on health outcomes in preterm infants: an overview of systematic reviews. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023;77(6):628-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-022-01223-1