DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20171523

Positive predictive value of pulse oximetry in the screening of critical congenital heart defects in term neonates

Krithika Damodar Shenoy, Suchetha S. Rao

Abstract


Background: Critical congenital heart defects (CCHD) are associated with poor patient outcome due to delay in diagnosis. Clinical examination alone has low positive predictive value (PPV). Pulse oximetry examination is suggested as supplemental screening tool. Aim of this study was to screen term neonates for CCHD by clinical and pulse oximetry evaluations and estimate their PPV separately and combined.

Methods:Cross-sectional study of 278 term neonates weighing ≥2500g excluding those with antenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects and/or requiring intensive care. Sample size calculated using EpiInfo version 7 taking 20,000 as population size, 7% expected frequency, 5% confidence limits and 99.9% confidence level. Ethical clearance and informed consent obtained. Clinical examination was performed within 24 hours of life followed by pre-ductal and post-ductal oxygen saturation (SpO2) recording, using standardized hand-held probe, between 24-48 hours. Neonates categorized as screen positive or negative based on an adapted algorithm. Screen positives were confirmed by echocardiography. SPSS version 16 was used for statistical analysis.

Results: Mean age at clinical examination was 7.72 ± 0.32 hours during which none screened positive. Mean age at SpO2 screening was 31.93 ± 0.32 hours and a single non-syndromic, acyanotic male newborn, weighing 2550g screened positive. He was found to have severe pulmonary outflow obstruction, with ductus-dependent flow on echocardiography. PPV for pulse oximetry screening alone was 100%.

Conclusions:Ductus dependent lesions missed on clinical examination may be picked up by pulse oximetry screening. Echocardiography may be used selectively to confirm diagnosis on screen positive. 


Keywords


Ductus dependent flow, Echocardiogram, Pulmonary outflow obstruction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Mahle WT, Newburger JW, Matheme GP, Smith FC, Hoke TR, Koppel R, et al. Role of pulse oximetry in examining newborns for congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the AHA and AAP. Circulation. 2009;120:447-58.

Linde D, Konings EEM, Slager MA, Witsenburg M, Helbing WA, Takkenberg JJM, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(21):2241-7.

Saxena A. Congenital heart disease in India: A status report. Indian J Pediatr. 2005;72(7):595-8.

Swenson AK, Brown D, Stevermer JJ. Pulse oximetry for newborns: should it be routine? J Fam Practice. 2012;61(5):283-6.

Cartlidge PHT. Routine discharge examination of babies: is it necessary? Arch Dis Child. 1992;67(12):1421-2.

Ainsworth SB, Wyllie JP, Wren C. Prevalence and clinical significance of cardiac murmurs in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999;80(1):43-5.

Richmond S, Reay G, Harb MA. Routine pulse oximetry in the asymptomatic newborn. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002;87:83-8.

Vaidyanathan B, Sathish G, Mohanan ST, Sundaram KR, Warrier KKR, Kumar RK. Clinical screening for congenital heart disease at birth: A prospective study in a community hospital in Kerala. Indian Pediatr. 2010;49:25-30.

Kumar RK. Screening for congenital heart disease in India: Rationale, practical challenges, and pragmatic strategies. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2016;9(2):111-4.

Thangaratinam S, Brown K, Zamora J, Khan KS, Ewer AK. Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects in asymptomatic newborn babies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 2012;379:2459-64.

Hospital guidelines for implementing pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart disease. Alabama Department of Public Health; 2015.

Rudolph AM. The changes in the circulation after birth: Their importance in congenital heart disease. Circulation. 1970;41(2):343-59.

Yun SW. Congenital heart disease in the newborn requiring early intervention. Korean J Pediatr. 2011;54(5):183-91.

Mallander M, Sunnegardh J. Failure to diagnose critical heart malformations in newborns before discharge- an increasing problem?. Acta Paediatr 2006;95(4):407-13.

de-Wahl Granelli A, Wennergren M, Sandberg K, Mellander M, Bejlum C,Inganas L, et al. Impact of pulse oximetry screening on the detection of duct dependent congenital heart disease: a Swedish prospective screening study in 39821 newborns. BMJ. 2009;338:3037.

Johnson LC, Lieberman E, O’Leary E, Geggel RL. Prenatal and newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease: Findings from a nursery. Pediatrics. 2014;134(5):916-22.

Ansary A. Pulse Oximetry Screening of Critical Congenital Heart Disease. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52:626.