Implementation of a standardized neonatal skin-care bundle using the neonatal skin condition score: a quality improvement initiative in a resource-limited neonatal intensive care unit

Authors

  • Rupam Das Department of Pediatrics, Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh, Assam, India
  • Reeta Bora Department of Pediatrics, Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh, Assam, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9134-2510

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20262969

Keywords:

Quality improvement, Neonatal skin condition score, Neonatal skin care, PDSA, Resource-limited setting, NICU

Abstract

Background: Neonatal skin, particularly in preterm and low-birth-weight (LBW) infants, is structurally immature and prone to injury, predisposing to increased transepidermal water loss, infection and prolonged hospitalization. Objective assessment of skin condition is seldom embedded in routine practice in many resource-limited neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). In our NICU, skin assessment was subjective, without a standardized scoring system, and root cause analysis identified inadequate staff training and lack of routine documentation as the main modifiable contributors. Objectives were to reduce abnormal skin findings by 50% within four weeks by embedding routine neonatal skin condition score (NSCS) assessment into practice.

Methods: This prospective quality improvement initiative ran for four weeks in a 35-bed tertiary NICU using two plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles. A standardized skin-care bundle comprising staff education, routine NSCS assessment, bedside charts and improved adhesive practices, was implemented. Proportions with dryness, erythema and breakdown were compared before and after using Fisher's exact test.

Results: Baseline prevalence of dryness, erythema and breakdown was 54.5%, 27.3% and 4.5%. By four weeks, dryness fell to 26.1% (p=0.07) and erythema to 13.0% (p=0.28), each with ~52% relative reduction, while breakdown was unchanged (4.3%; p=1.00). Neither reached statistical significance, but both showed a downward trend, and routine NSCS assessment continued beyond the project.

Conclusions: A standardized skin-care bundle incorporating routine NSCS assessment was feasible and associated with clinically meaningful reductions in dryness and erythema, with sustained adoption of objective skin assessment. Larger, longer initiatives are warranted to confirm these findings.

References

Kalia YN, Nonato LB, Lund CH, Guy RH. Development of skin barrier function in premature infants. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111(2):320-6.

Hammarlund K, Sedin G. Transepidermal water loss in newborn infants. VIII. Relation to gestational age and post-natal age in appropriate and small for gestational age infants. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1983;72(5):721-8.

Nikolovski J, Stamatas GN, Kollias N, Wiegand BC. Barrier function and water-holding and transport properties of infant stratum corneum are different from adult and continue to develop through the first year of life. J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128(7):1728-36.

Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN). Neonatal Skin Care: Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: AWHONN; 2013.

Lund CH, Osborne JW. Validity and reliability of the Neonatal Skin Condition Score. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004;33(3):320-7.

Lund CH, Osborne JW, Kuller J, Lane AT, Lott JW, Raines DA. Neonatal skin care: clinical outcomes of the AWHONN/NANN evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2001;30(1):41-51.

Lund CH, Kuller J, Lane AT, Lott JW, Raines DA, Thomas KK. Neonatal skin care: evaluation of the AWHONN/NANN research-based practice project on knowledge and skin care practices. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2001;30(1):30-40.

Lund CH, Nonato LB, Kuller JM, Franck LS, Cullander C, Durand DJ. Disruption of barrier function in neonatal skin associated with adhesive removal. J Pediatr. 1997;131(3):367-72.

Langley GJ, Moen RD, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost LP. The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009.

Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C, Darzi A, Bell D, Reed JE. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(4):290-8.

Deorari A, Mehta R, Livesley N. Improving the Quality of Care for Mothers and Newborns in Health Facilities: Point of Care Quality Improvement (POCQI). Facilitator Manual. New Delhi: World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia; 2017.

Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(12):986-92.

Goodman D, Ogrinc G, Davies L, Baker GR, Barnsteiner J, Foster TC, et al. Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(12):e7.

Visscher MO, Adam R, Brink S, Odio M. Newborn infant skin: physiology, development, and care. Clin Dermatol. 2015;33(3):271-80.

Darmstadt GL, Mao-Qiang M, Chi E, Saha SK, Ziboh VA, Black RE, et al. Impact of topical oils on the skin barrier: possible implications for neonatal health in developing countries. Acta Paediatr. 2002;91(5):546-54.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-26

How to Cite

Das, R., & Bora, R. (2026). Implementation of a standardized neonatal skin-care bundle using the neonatal skin condition score: a quality improvement initiative in a resource-limited neonatal intensive care unit. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 13(9), 1771–1776. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20262969

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles