Level of agreement on SpO2 and response time between fingertip pulse oximeter and conventional bedside pulse oximeter among preterm neonates: a tertiary care study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20262961Keywords:
Agreement, Oxygen saturation, Oximetry, PrematureAbstract
Background: Fingertip pulse oximeters are used to measure peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) levels in newborns and have been recommended to improve access to monitoring devices in resource-limited settings. However, evidence regarding their use in preterm neonates is limited. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the level of agreement in peripheral oxygen saturation and response time between fingertip pulse oximeters and conventional bedside pulse oximeters in preterm neonates.
Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 201 preterm neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, India. Preterm neonates who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled using consecutive sampling. Medical records were reviewed to obtain information on clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. Both a conventional bedside pulse oximeter and a fingertip pulse oximeter were used to assess SpO₂ and response times. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests (t-test), Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (Wilcoxon SR test), Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses.
Results: A significant difference in SpO₂ values (p<0.001) was observed between the devices, while response times showed no significant difference (p=0.107). The ICC indicated fair to good agreement for both parameters (p<0.001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed no significant bias, supporting the consistency between the devices.
Conclusions: The fingertip pulse oximeter demonstrated clinically acceptable agreement with the conventional bedside device for measuring SpO₂ in preterm neonates.
References
World Health Organization. Global nutrition targets: low birth weight policy brief, 2025. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-NMH-NHD-14.5. Accessed on 16 October 2024.
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcomes. Preterm birth: causes, consequences and prevention. Behrman RE, Butler AS, eds. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 2007. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Accessed on 21 Augut 2025.
Pilcher J, Ploen L, McKinstry S, Bardsley G, Chien J, Howard L, et al. A multicentre prospective observational study comparing arterial blood gas values to those obtained by pulse oximeters used in adult patients attending Australian and New Zealand hospitals. BMC Pulm Med. 2020;20:7.
Graham H, Bakare AA, Ayede AI, Oyewole OB, Gray A, Peel D, et al. Hypoxaemia in hospitalised children and neonates: A prospective cohort study in Nigerian secondary-level hospitals. E Clinical Medicine. 2019;16:51–63.
Emdin CA, Mir F, Sultana S, Kazi AM, Zaidi AK, Dimitris MC, et al. Utility and feasibility of integrating pulse oximetry into the routine assessment of young infants at primary care clinics in Karachi, Pakistan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15:141.
Baker K, Petzold M, Mucunguzi A, Wharton-Smith A, Dantzer E, Habte T, et al. Performance of five pulse oximeters to detect hypoxaemia as an indicator of severe illness in children under five by frontline health workers in low resource settings - A prospective, multicentre, single-blinded, trial in Cambodia, Ethiopia, South Sudan and Uganda. E Clinical Medicine. 2021;38:101040.
Khamkar AM, Pote PD, Jose GE. A comparison of finger pulse oximeter and set-based neonatal pulse oximeter in neonates in terms of spo2 values and response time. Indian J Pediatr. 2022;89:1120-2.
Reddy NJ, HS K, Subhash Chandra BJ, Gowdappa HB. Comparison of pocket pulse oximeter and standard pulse oximeter with ABG analysis in critically ill patients. SJMS. 2021;16:509
Kolstad V, Pike H, Eilevstjønn J, Buskov F, Ersdal H, Rettedal S. Use of Pulse Oximetry during Resuscitation of 230 Newborns-A Video Analysis. Children (Basel). 2023;10:1124.
Tajkia G, Shirin M, Hossain MM, Al Mamun MA. Accuracy of SpO2 measurements by placing probes on newborns’ wrists and ankles. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2019;45:191-6.
Smith RN, Hofmeyr R. Perioperative comparison of the agreement between a portable fingertip pulse oximeter v. a conventional bedside pulse oximeter in adult patients (COMFORT trial). S Afr Med J. 2019;109:154-8.
Mandala VK, Bollaboina SKY, Changala B, Kotha R Sr, Kasula L. Intermittent hypoxia in preterm neonates and its effect on neonatal morbidity and mortality: a systematic review. Cureus. 2023;15:45561.
Pupim D, Iwaki Filho L, Takeshita WM, Iwaki LC. Evaluation of accuracy of portable fingertip pulse oximeter, as compared to that of a hospital oximeter with digital sensor. Indian J Dent Res. 2013;24:542-6.
Keerthy S, Nagesh NK. Efficacious continuous monitoring of infants using wireless remote monitoring technology. Indian J Pediatr. 2022;89:771-5.
Sharma A, Hjela R, Sohi I. To estimate accuracy and feasibility of Paediatric Pulse Oximeter for use in newborns by comparing it with cardiac monitor as gold standard. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2023;14:2880-4.
Morgan MC, Maina B, Waiyego M, Mutinda C, Aluvaala J, Maina M, et al. Oxygen saturation ranges for healthy newborns within 24 hours at 1800 m. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017;102:266-8.
McCollum ED, King C, Deula R, Zadutsa B, Mankhambo L, Nambiar B, et al. Pulse oximetry for children with pneumonia treated as outpatients in rural Malawi. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94:893-902.
Blanc J, Locatelli I, Rarau P, Mueller I, Genton B, Boillat-Blanco N, et al. Retrospective study on the usefulness of pulse oximetry for the identification of young children with severe illnesses and severe pneumonia in a rural outpatient clinic of Papua New Guinea. PLoS One. 2019;14:213937.
Khan A, Rabbani B, Jameel A, Khan B, Husain T, Ahmed J. Comparison between portable pulse oximeter and conventional ICU pulse oximeter measurements in healthy adults: a cross-sectional study. Annals. 2024;29:4-11.
Varga Z, Cassoly E, Li Q, Oehlschlegel C, Tapia C, Lehr HA, et al. Standardization for Ki-67 assessment in moderately differentiated breast cancer. A retrospective analysis of the SAKK 28/12 study. PLoS One. 2015;10:123435.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
