Comparative study on effectiveness of a traditional brief intervention method versus a virtual teach-to-goal approach in educating hospitalized children with asthma on proper inhaler technique

Authors

  • Ariya Venu Department of Paediatric, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Thiruvalla, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, India
  • Jacob Abraham Department of Paediatric, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Thiruvalla, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, India
  • Bincy Varghese Department of Paediatric, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Thiruvalla, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, India
  • Carol Sara Cherian Department of Paediatric, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Thiruvalla, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20263296

Keywords:

Asthma, Inhaler technique, Metered-dose inhaler, Spacer, Virtual teach-to-goal, Brief intervention, Children

Abstract

Background: Correct inhaler technique is essential for achieving optimal asthma control in children. However, incorrect inhaler use remains common and contributes to poor disease control, recurrent exacerbations, and increased healthcare utilization. Hospitalization provides an important opportunity for inhaler education. This study compared the effectiveness of a traditional brief intervention (BI) with a Virtual Teach-to-Goal (V-TTG) approach in improving inhaler technique among children with asthma.

Methods: This comparative study was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kerala, over 18 months. Sixty-six children aged 4-15 years with asthma (33 in each group) were enrolled. Participants received either conventional face-to-face inhaler education (BI) or standardized video-based V-TTG education. Inhaler technique was assessed before and after intervention using a validated 12-step metered-dose inhaler with spacer checklist. Follow-up assessment evaluated retention of correct inhaler technique. Continuous variables were analyzed using paired and independent t tests, while categorical variables were compared using Chi-square/Fisher's exact test. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Both educational interventions significantly improved inhaler technique scores from baseline (BI: 6.94±1.32 to 9.67±1.65, p<0.001; V-TTG: 6.91±1.51 to 10.70±1.33, p<0.001). The V-TTG group achieved significantly higher post-intervention scores than the BI group (10.70±1.33 vs. 9.67±1.65; p=0.007). At follow-up, a greater proportion of children in the V-TTG group demonstrated correct inhaler technique (75.8% vs. 63.6%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.284). Older children demonstrated significantly better inhaler technique than younger children (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Both traditional BI and V-TTG education significantly improved inhaler technique in children with asthma. However, the V-TTG approach resulted in superior immediate improvement in inhaler technique and represents an effective, scalable strategy for asthma education in pediatric practice.

 

References

Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. Updated 2023. Available at: www.ginasthma.org. Accessed on 02 July 2026.

World Health Organization. Asthma. Fact sheet. Geneva: WHO. 2023.

Barnes PJ. Inhaled corticosteroids. Pharmacol Ther. 1998;58(2):161-90.

Melani AS, Bonavia M, Cilenti V, Cristina C, Marco L, Paola M, et al. Inhaler mishandling remains common in real life and is associated with reduced disease control. Respir Med. 2011;105(6):930-8.

Giraud V, Roche N. Improper inhaler technique of corticosteroid metered-dose inhaler is associated with decreased asthma stability. Eur Respir J. 2002;19(2):246-51.

Deerojanawong J, Naipatanon S, Prapphal N. Inhaler technique of Thai children with asthma. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2009;27(4):199-204.

George M, Rand C. Self-management of asthma: promoting adherence to inhaled corticosteroids. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130(3):575-82.

Carpenter DM, Geryk LL, Sage A, Mark W, Daniel R, Tamera CB, et al. Using videos to teach children inhaler technique: a randomized controlled trial. J Asthma. 2015;52(1):81-8.

Subbarao P, Mandhane PJ, Sears MR. Asthma: epidemiology, etiology and risk factors. CMAJ. 2009;181(9):E181-90.

Burke W, Fesinmeyer M, Reed K, Hampson L, Carlsten C. Family history as a predictor of asthma risk. Am J Prev Med. 2003;24(2):160-9.

Volerman A, Balachandran U, Zhu M, Akel M, Hull A, Siros M, et al. Evaluating Inhaler Education Interventions for Hospitalized Children with Asthma: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023;130(6):759-66.

O'Connor A, Dennett E, Hasan M, Stovold E, Carson-Chahhoud K. Home-based Educational Interventions for Children with Asthma, a Cochrane Review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;2(2):CD008469.

Salvi S. Digital Health and Asthma Care in India: Bridging the Gap. Indian J Med Res. 2024;159(3):210-8.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-23

How to Cite

Venu, A., Abraham, J., Varghese, B., & Cherian, C. S. (2026). Comparative study on effectiveness of a traditional brief intervention method versus a virtual teach-to-goal approach in educating hospitalized children with asthma on proper inhaler technique. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 13(10), 1942–1946. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20263296

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles