Effect of hydrocolloid dressing on nasal injury among preterm neonates on nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a randomized controlled trial

Authors

  • Bideshwori Takhelmayum Department of Pediatric Nursing, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India
  • Vetriselvi Prabakaran Department of Pediatric Nursing, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5122-8203

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20262960

Keywords:

Hydrocolloid dressing, Nasal injury, Preterm

Abstract

Background: Respiratory distress in preterm neonates is a common cause of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is widely used in the management of respiratory distress. Preterm neonates are at high risk for nasal injury during nCPAP. The present study was aimed to assess the effect of hydrocolloid dressing on nasal injury among preterm neonates on nCPAP.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was carried out among 78 preterm neonates in a NICU of a tertiary care centre. Simple random sampling technique was used to enroll the preterm neonates who met the inclusion criteria. Data pertaining to demographic clinical characteristics were collected from medical record and the skin condition of the nares was assessed daily by observation. Data were analysed using SPSS software version 22. To analyze the data descriptive statistics including frequency, percentage and inferential statistics including chi-square test were utilized. 

Results: Though the incidence of nasal injury in experimental group was lesser than control group (12.8% vs 23% respectively) it was not statistically significant p=0.23.   There was a significant association between the level of nasal injury and the duration of nCPAP (p=0.04).

Conclusions: Prophylactic use of hydrocolloid dressing during nCPAP reduces nasal injury in preterm neonates.

Author Biography

Vetriselvi Prabakaran, Department of Pediatric Nursing, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India

College of nursing,JIPMER,Assistant professor

References

Mathai SS, Raju U, Kanitkar M. Management of respiratory distress in the new born. Med J Armed Forces India. 2007;63(3)269-72.

Amatya S, Macomber M, Bhutada A. Sudden Versus gradual pressure wean from nasal CPAP in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2017;37:662-7.

Pillow JJ, Hillman N, Moss TJ, Proglase G, Bold G, Beaumont C, et al. Bubble continuous positive airway pressure enhances lung volume and gas exchange in preterm lambs. Am J Respir crit Care Med. 2007;176(1):63-9.

Tapia JL, Urzua S, Bancaleri A, Meritano J, Torres G, Fabres J, et al. Randomized trial of early bubble continuous positive airway pressure for very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 2012;161(1):75-80.

Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, Tooley WH, Hamilton WK. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory-distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med. 1971;284(24):1333-40.

Morley C, Davis P. Continuous positive airway pressure: current controversies. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2004;16(2):141-5.

Elsobkey AF, Amer AM. Effect of educational guidelines program about nursing care of neonates receiving continuous positive airway pressure-A quasi-experimental research. IOSR-JNHS. 2018;7:16-26.

Jasani B, Ismail A, Rao S, Patole S. Effectiveness and safety of nasal mask versus binasal prongs for providing continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants-A systematic review and meta‚Äêanalysis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2018;53(7):987-92.

Davis P, Davies M, Faber B. A randomised controlled trial of two methods of delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure after extubation to infants weighing less than 1000 g: binasal (Hudson) versus single nasal prongs. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal. 2001;85(2):82-5.

Trevisanuto D, Grazzina N, Doglioni N, Ferrarese P, Marzari F, zanando V. A new device for administration of continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: comparison with a standard nasal CPAP continuous positive airway pressure system. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:859-64.

Squires AJ, Hydman M. Prevention of nasal injuries secondary to NCPAP application in the ELBW infant. Neonatal Netw. 2009;28(1):13-27.

Robertson NJ, McCarthy LS, Hamilton PA, Moss AL. Nasal deformities resulting from flow driver continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal. 1996;75(3):209-12.

Buettiker V, Hug MI, Baenziger O, Meyer C, Frey B. Advantages and disadvantages of different nasal CPAP systems in newborns. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:926-30.

Bonner KM, Mainous RO. The Nursing Care of the infant receiving bubble CPAP therapy. Adv Neonatal Care. 2008;8(2):78-95.

Diblasi RM. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for the respiratory care of the newborn infant. Respir Care 2009;54(9):1209-1235.

Cartlidge P. The epidermal barrier. Semin Neonatal. 2000;5(4):273-80.

Yong SC, Chen SJ, Boo NY. Incidence of nasal trauma associated with nasal prong versus nasal mask during continuous positive airway pressure treatment in very low birthweight infants: a Randomised controlled study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal. 2005;90(6):480-3.

Li Y, Sepulveda A, Buchanan EP. Late presenting nasal deformities after nasal continuous positive airway pressure injury: 33-year experience. J Plast Reconst Aesth Surg. 2015;68(3):339-43.

Lefrak L. Infection risk reduction in the intensive care nursery: a review of patient care practices that impact the infection risk in global care of the hospitalized neonates. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2016;30(2):139-47.

Carlisle HR, Kamlin COF, Owen LS, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Oral continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) following nasal injury in a preterm infant. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal. 2010;95(2):142-3.

Newnam KM, McGrath JM, Estes T, Jallon Salyer J, Bass WT. An integrative review of skin breakdown in the preterm infant associated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2013;42(5):508-16.

McCoskey L. Nursing Care Guidelines for prevention of nasal breakdown in neonates receiving nasal CPAP. Adv Neonatal Care. 2008;8(2):116-24.

Wilkinson D, Andersen C, O'Donnell CP, De Paoli AG, Manley BJ. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;22(2):6405.

DeMauro SB, Millar D, Kirpalani H. Noninvasive respiratory support for neonates. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2014;26(2):157-62.

Xie LH. Hydrocolloid dressing in preventing nasal trauma secondary to nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. World J Emerg Med. 2014;5(3):218-22.

Gunlemez A, Isken T, Gokalp AS, Turker G, Arisoy EA. Effect of silicone gel sheeting in nasal injury associated with nasal CPAP in preterm infants. Indian Pediatr. 2010;47(3):265-7.

Badr LK, Zeineddine MH, Abbass H, Charafeddine L. Neoseal to prevent nasal injury in preterm infants receiving oxygen therapy. Neonatal Netw. 2016;35(4):228-33.

Collins CL, Barfield C, Horne RS, Davis PG. A comparison of nasal trauma in preterm infants extubated to either heated humified high-flow nasal cannulae or nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Eur J Pediatr. 2014;173(2):181-6.

Morris DL, Behr JH, Smith SL. Hydrocolloid to prevent breakdown of nares in preterm infants. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2015;40(1):39-43.

Imbulana D, Louise S, Jennifer A. A randomized controlled trial of a barrier dressing to reduce nasal injury in preterm infants receiving binasal non-invasive respiratory support. J Pediatr. 2018;201(10):34-9.

Ota TN, Davidson J, Guinsburg R. Early nasal injury resulting from the use of nasal prongs in preterm infants with very low birth weight: a pilot study. Rev Bras Ter Inten. 2013;25(3):245-50.

Dascimento RM, Ferreira AL, Coutinho AC, Santo S. The frequency of nasal injury in newborns due to the use of continuous positive airway pressure with prongs. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2009;17(4):489-94.

Singh J, Bhardwar V, Chirla DK. To compare the efficacy and complication of nasal prongs vs nasal mask CPAP in neonates. Int J Med and Dent Sci. 2017;6(1):1392-7.

Fischer C, Bertelle V, Hohlfeld J, Forcada-Guex M, Stadelmann Diaw C. Nasal trauma due to continuous positive airway pressure in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal. 2010;95(6):447-51.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-26

How to Cite

Takhelmayum, B., & Prabakaran, V. (2026). Effect of hydrocolloid dressing on nasal injury among preterm neonates on nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 13(9), 1710–1715. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20262960

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles