Clinical spectrum of cerebral palsy in children aged up to 16 years using gross motor function classification system score for management at a tertiary care centre

Urvi J. Dantaliya; Neelam Sharma

doi:10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20261913

Authors

Urvi J. Dantaliya Department of Paediatrics, GMERS Medical College, Junagadh, Gujarat, India
Neelam Sharma Department of Paediatrics, GMERS Medical College, Junagadh, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20261913

Keywords:

Cerebral palsy, GMFCS score, Spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy

Abstract

Background: Cerebral palsy is the most common and costly form of chronic motor disability that begins in childhood. Cerebral palsy is a well-recognised neurodevelopment condition beginning in early childhood and persisting through the lifespan In India prevalence of cerebral palsy ranges between 1.4 to 3.1 per 1000 lives birth. Gross motor function classification system (GMFCS) score for cerebral palsy is based on self-initiated movement with emphasis on sitting, transfer and mobility.

Methods: This is observational cross-sectional study with sample size of 45 patients aged up to 16 years (taken according to inclusion and exclusion criteria). A detail history regarding prenatal, natal and postnatal events were asked and etiology was grouped under antenatal, natal, postnatal or idiopathic. Past history of admission (NICU) or any events will be noted. Severities of grading will be classified according to GMFCS.

Results: The mean age of the children studied was 3.31 years, with a greater prevalence in males (68.9%) than females (31.1%). A significant number of children were born preterm (26.7%), with most deliveries occurring in hospitals (75.6%). Key risk factors identified included low birth weight (46.7%), prematurity (28.9%) and birth asphyxia (17.8%). Spastic cerebral palsy was the most common type, affecting 93.4% of the children in the study.

Conclusions: The Present study suggests that early diagnosis and assessment of the GMFCS score are crucial for optimizing the ambulatory management of children with cerebral palsy, potentially improving their functional outcomes. In this study, spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy has a statistically significant association with GMFCS score. The GMFCS Score is instrumental in setting rehabilitation goals for cerebral palsy, catering to various ages and severity levels. It is key in assessing functional outcomes in diverse settings, enhancing quality of life.

References

Patel DR, Neelakantan M, Pandher K, Merrick J. Cerebral palsy in children: a clinical overview. Transl Pediatr. 2020;9(1):S125-35.

Graham HK, Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Dan B, Lin JP, Damiano DL, et al. Cerebral palsy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:15082.

Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M, Damiano D, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007;109:8-14.

Colver A, Fairhurst C, Pharoah PO. Cerebral palsy. Lancet. 2014;383(9924):1240-9.

National Guideline Alliance (UK). Cerebral palsy in under 25s: assessment and management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). 2017. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng6. Accessed on 11 May 2026.

Vitrikas K, Dalton H, Breish D. Cerebral palsy: an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2020;101(4):213-20.

Paul S, Nahar A, Bhagawati M, Kunwar AJ. A Review on Recent Advances of Cerebral Palsy. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:2622310.

Lee RW, Poretti A, Cohen JS, Levey E, Gwynn H, Johnston MV, et al. A diagnostic approach for cerebral palsy in the genomic era. Neuromolecular Med. 2014;16(4):821-44.

Abd Elmagid DS, Magdy H. Evaluation of risk factors for cerebral palsy. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg. 2021;57:13.

Cans C. Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe: a collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42(12):816-24.

Sadowska M, Sarecka-Hujar B, Kopyta I. Cerebral Palsy: Current Opinions on Definition, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification and Treatment Options. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;16:1505-18.

Bar-On L, Molenaers G, Aertbeliën E, Van Campenhout A, Feys H, Nuttin B, et al. Spasticity and its contribution to hypertonia in cerebral palsy. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:317047.

Paulson A, Vargus-Adams J. Overview of Four Functional Classification Systems Commonly Used in Cerebral Palsy. Children (Basel). 2017;4(4):30.

Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Bartlett D, Livingston M, Walter S, Russell D. CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University. CanChild. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University. 2007.

Rosenbaum PL, Palisano RJ, Bartlett DJ, Galuppi BE, Russell DJ. Development of the Gross Motor Function Classification System for cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(4):249-53.

Parveen S. Management and Treatment for Cerebral Palsy in Children’s. Indian J Pharm Pract. 2018;11(2):104-9.

Roberts A. Surgical management of spasticity. J Child Orthop. 2013;7(5):389-94.

Park EY, Kim WH. Relationship between the gross motor function classification system and functional outcomes in children with cerebral palsy. Indian J Sci Technol. 2015;8(18):75902-7.

Shevell MI, Dagenais L, Hall N. The relationship of cerebral palsy subtype and functional motor impairment: a population-based study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51(11):872-7.

Abas O, Abdelazeim F, Kilany A. Clinical spectrum of cerebral palsy and associated disability in South Egypt: a local survey study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017;5(1):37-41.

Kumar R, Gupta AK, Runu R, Pandey SK, Kumar M. Clinical profile of cerebral palsy: a study from multi-disciplinary clinic at tertiary care centre. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2018;5:1626-30.

Reddy B. A study of clinical spectrum and risk factors of cerebral palsy in children. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2018;17(1):9-52.