Early detection of congenital anomalies in newborns: a tertiary hospital's approach to screening and risk assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20262410Keywords:
Birth defect, Risk factors, Childhood disability, Screening, Congenital anomaliesAbstract
Background: The spectrum of congenital anomalies ranges from minor issues like polydactyly to conditions unsustainable with life like anencephaly. The impact is on the affected children, parents or caregivers and the society at large. The most dreaded concern is death of the child. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of congenital anomalies and associated risk factors among neonates in a tertiary care hospital in Bengaluru, India.
Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted over six months, involving 202 neonates. Data were collected via validated questionnaires covering socio-demographic details, comprehensive antenatal history, birth history, and the presence of congenital anomalies. Settings and design was hospital-based cross-sectional study. Statistical analysis used: The association between risk factors and congenital anomalies was assessed using Chi-square tests and Odds ratios.
Results: Out of 202 neonates included, the proportion of congenital anomalies was 8.4% (17) with congenital heart diseases (07) being the commonest followed by congenital talipes equino varus (CTEV) (04). Foetal risk factors for disability were observed among 93 (46%) of the neonates. Common neonatal risk factors observed were neonatal jaundice, Low Birth Weight, prematurity and neonatal asphyxia. Congenital anomalies were slightly higher among boys: 13 (11.7%) than girls: 4 (4.3%). Proportion of foetal risk factors was similar among boys and girls.
Conclusions: The study highlights a higher prevalence of congenital anomalies than the national average, emphasizing the need for mandatory congenital anomaly screening and establishing a comprehensive congenital malformation registry in India.
References
World Health Organization. Congenital disorders. Geneva: WHO. Available at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/congenital-anomalies. Accessed on 08 March 2026.
Kar A, Dhamdhere D, Medhekar A. "Fruits of our past karma": a qualitative study on knowledge and attitudes about congenital anomalies among women in Pune district, India. J Community Genet. 2023;14(4):429-38.
Oftedal A, Bekkhus M, Haugen G, Hjemdal O, Czajkowski NO, Kaasen A. Long-term impact of diagnosed fetal anomaly on parental traumatic stress, resilience, and relationship satisfaction. J Pediatr Psychol. 2023;48:181-92.
Barrie A, Varacallo M. Clubfoot. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2023.
Christianson A, Howson CP, Modell B. Global report on congenital anomaly: the hidden toll of dying and disabled children. New York: March of Dimes. 2006.
Bhide P, Kar A. A national estimate of the birth prevalence of birth defects in India: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):10.
Cardoso-dos-Santos AC, Alves RS, Medeiros-de-Souza AC, Bremm JM, Gomes JD, Alves RF, et al. National congenital anomaly registers in the world: historical and operational aspects. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2021;30(4):e2021075.
Taksande A, Vilhekar K, Chaturvedi P, Jain M. Congenital malformations at birth in Central India: a rural medical college hospital-based data. Indian J Hum Genet. 2010;16(3):159.
Bhide P, Kar A. A national estimate of the birth prevalence of congenital anomalies in India: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):175.
Kumar J, Saini SS, Sundaram V, Mukhopadhyay K, Dutta S, Kakkar N, et al. Prevalence & spectrum of congenital anomalies at a tertiary care centre in north India over 20 years (1998-2017). Indian J Med Res. 2021;154(3):483-90.
Sarkar S, Patra C, Dasgupta MK, Nayek K, Karmakar PR. Prevalence of congenital anomalies in neonates and associated risk factors in a tertiary care hospital in eastern India. J Clin Neonatol. 2013;2(3):131-4.
Almeida LF, Araujo Júnior E, Crott GC, Okido MM, Berezowski AT, Duarte G, et al. Epidemiological risk factors and perinatal outcomes of congenital anomalies. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016;38(7):348-55.
Malik M, Khanna P, Verma R. Association of maternal risk factors to congenital anomalies among infants: a community-based study in rural areas of Haryana, India. J Assoc Physicians India. 2019;67(9):38-41.
Sunitha T, Prasoona KR, Kumari TM, Srinadh B, Deepika MLN, Aruna R, et al. Risk factors for congenital anomalies in high-risk pregnant women: a large study from South India. Egypt J Med Hum Genet. 2016;18(1):79-85.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
