Comparative study between modified Mathieu technique and tubularized incised plate technique in primary repair of distal hypospadias
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20261137Keywords:
Distal hypospadias, Mathieu-IP repair, TIP, UrethroplastyAbstract
Background: Hypospadias is a congenital anomaly in which the urethral opening is located on the ventral surface of the penis proximal to the glans tip. Among various surgical options, tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty is widely used. However, anatomical factors such as a narrow urethral plate and shallow glans may limit its success and increase complications. A modified technique combining features of TIP and the Mathieu procedure has been proposed to address these limitations. This study aimed to compare outcomes of the Modified Mathieu (Mathieu-IP) technique and TIP urethroplasty in primary distal hypospadias repair.
Methods: This study was conducted at DMCH from January 2021 to June 2022, including 44 patients aged 1-12 years with primary distal hypospadias. Patients were purposively divided into two groups: 22 underwent the Modified Mathieu technique and 22 underwent TIP repair. Follow-up was done on postoperative days 7 and 14, and at 1 and 3 months (excluding four patients lost to follow-up). Data on perioperative variables and complications were analyzed using Student’s t-test, Chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test, with p<0.05 considered significant.
Results: No significant difference was observed in neo-meatus formation. Meatal stenosis occurred in two (10%) TIP patients. Urethrocutaneous fistula was seen in five (25%) TIP patients and three (15%) Modified Mathieu patients. Splayed urinary stream occurred in 15% and 25% of patients, respectively, while 10% of TIP patients had a narrow stream. These differences were not statistically significant (p=0.219).
Conclusions: No significant difference was found between the Modified Mathieu and TIP techniques in primary distal hypospadias repair.
References
Baskin LS, Duckett JW, Lue TF. Penile curvature. Urol. 1996;48(3):347-56.
Paulozzi LJ, Erickson JD, Jackson RJ. Hypospadias trends in two US surveillance systems. Pediatrics. 1997;100(5):831-4.
Bouty A, Ayers KL, Pask A, Heloury Y, Sinclair AH. The genetic and environmental factors underlying hypospadias. Sexual Developm. 2016;9(5):239-59.
Baskin LS, Ebbers MB. Hypospadias: anatomy, etiology, and technique. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41(3):463-72.
Yesildag E, Tekant G, Sarimurat N, Buyukunal SC. Do patch procedures prevent complications of the Mathieu technique?. J Urol. 2004;171(6):2623-5.
Holland AJ, Smith GH. Effect of the depth and width of the urethral plate on tubularized incised plate urethroplasty. J Urol. 2000;164(2):489-91.
Gonzales Jr ET, Veeraraghavan KA, Delaune J. The management of distal hypospadias with meatal-based, vascularized flaps. J Urol. 1983;129(1):119-20.
Snodgrass W, Macedo A, Hoebeke P, Mouriquand PD. Hypospadias dilemmas: a round table. J Pediatr Urol. 2011;7(2):145-57.
İmamoğlu MA, Bakırtaş H. Comparison of two methods-Mathieu and Snodgrass-in hypospadias repair. Urolog international. 2003;71(3):251-4.
Kalfa N, Philibert P, Sultan C. Is hypospadias a genetic, endocrine or environmental disease, or still an unexplained malformation?. Int J Androl. 2009;32(3):187-97.
Kalfa N, Philibert P, Baskin LS, Sultan C. Hypospadias: interactions between environment and genetics. Mole Cell Endocrinol. 2011;335(2):89-95.
Khalil M, Gharib T, El-Shaer W, Sebaey A, Elmohamady B, Elgamal K. Mathieu technique with incision of the urethral plate versus standard tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty in primary repair of distal hypospadias: A prospective randomised study. Arab J Urol. 2017;15(3):242-7.
Lund L, Engebjerg MC, Pedersen L, Ehrenstein V, Nørgaard M, Sørensen HT. Prevalence of hypospadias in Danish boys: a longitudinal study