Point-of-care ultrasound-guided hemodynamic assessment and resuscitation in neonatal shock: a prospective observational study

Authors

  • Kamran Shafi SKIMS Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4018-8137
  • Tundup Dorjai SKIMS Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Vamiq Rasool Beigh SKIMS Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20261524

Keywords:

Neonatal shock, Point-of-care ultrasound, Focused echocardiography, Hemodynamic monitoring, NICU

Abstract

Background: Neonatal shock is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Clinical assessment alone often fails to accurately identify the underlying hemodynamic disturbance, which can delay appropriate management. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a rapid bedside tool for evaluating cardiovascular status in critically ill neonates. This study aimed to assess the utility of POCUS in identifying the etiology of neonatal shock and its influence on therapeutic decision-making.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the NICU of the Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology in collaboration with the Department of Cardiology at Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Srinagar, over an 18-month period. Neonates presenting with clinical features of shock were enrolled. Infants with congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy, or structural valvular abnormalities were excluded. Bedside POCUS with focused echocardiography was performed at admission and during follow-up. Hemodynamic parameters including inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter, IVC collapsibility index (IVC-CI), and IVC/aorta ratio (AO) ratio were assessed. The relationship between ultrasound findings, etiology of shock, and subsequent management decisions was analyzed.

Results: A total of 110 neonates with shock were included. Septic shock was the most common etiology (41.6%), followed by cardiogenic shock (34.5%) and hypovolemic shock (23.6%). Early-onset shock (≤24 hours of life) was observed in 72.7% of cases. Significant variations in IVC parameters were observed among the different types of shock (p<0.05). Neonates with hypovolemic shock demonstrated higher IVC collapsibility, while cardiogenic shock was associated with increased IVC diameter and reduced collapsibility. POCUS findings resulted in modification of clinical management in a substantial proportion of cases, including optimization of fluid resuscitation, initiation or adjustment of inotropic therapy, and targeted supportive care. The overall mortality rate was 9.1%.

Conclusions: POCUS provides rapid, bedside hemodynamic assessment in neonates with shock and aids in differentiating underlying etiologies. Its integration into routine NICU practice can facilitate timely, targeted management and may improve clinical outcomes.

References

Kleinman C S, Seri I. in Hemodynamics and Cardiology: Neonatology Questions and Controversies 2nd edn (ed. Polin, R. A.) (Elsevier Health Sciences, Amsterdam). 2012.

Soleymani S, Borzage M, Seri I. Hemodynamic monitoring in neonates: advances and challenges. J Perinatol. 2010;30:S38-45.

Soul JS. Fluctuating pressure-passivity is common in the cerebral circulation of sick premature infants. Pediatr. Res. 2007;61:467-73.

Elsayed Y, Wahab MGA, Mohamed A, Fadel NB, Bhombal S, Yousef N, et al. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) protocol for systematic assessment of the crashing neonate-expert consensus statement of the international crashing neonate working group. Eur J Pediatr. 2023;182(1):53-66.

Singh Y, Tissot C, Fraga MV, Yousef N, Cortes RG, Lopez J. et al. International evidence-based guidelines on point of care ultrasound (POCUS) for critically ill neonates and children issued by the POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) Crit Care. 2020;24(1):1-16.

Nguyen J, Amirnovin R, Ramanathan R, Noori S. The state of point-of- care ultrasonography use and training in neonatal-perinatal medicine and pediatric critical care medicine fellowship programs. J Perinatol. 2016;36(11):972-6.

Kendall JL, Hoffenberg SR, Smith RS. History of emergency and critical care ultrasound: the evolution of a new imaging paradigm. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5):S126-30

Abu-Zidan FM. Point-of-care ultrasound in critically ill patients: Where do we stand? J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2012;5(1):70-1.

Gillman LM, Kirkpatrick AW. Portable bedside ultrasound: the visual stethoscope of the 21st century. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012;20:18.

Nguyen J, Amirnovin R, Ramanathan R, Noori S. The state of point-of- care ultrasonography use and training in neonatal-perinatal medicine and pediatric critical care medicine fellowship programs. J Perinatol. 2016;36(11):972-6.

Singh Y, Gupta S, Groves AM. Expert consensus statement Neonatologist-performed Echocardiography (NoPE)‟-training and accreditation in UK. Eur J Pediatr. 2016;175(2):281-7.

Singh Y, Tissot C, Fraga MV. International evidence-based guidelines on point of care ultrasound (POCUS) for critically ill neonates and children issued by the POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC). Crit Care. 2020;24(1):65.

Moore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(8):749-57.

McLario DJ, Sivitz AB. Point-of-care ultrasound in pediatric clinical care. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(6):594-600.

Noori S, Seri I. Does targeted neonatal echocardiography affect hemodynamics and cerebral oxygenation in extremely preterm infants? J Perinatol. 2014;34(11):847-9.

Wen J, Yu Q, Chen H, Chen N, Huang S, Cai W. Peripherally inserted central venous catheter-associated complications exert negative effects on body weight gain in neonatal intensive care units. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017;26(1):1-5.

Oestreich AE. Umbilical vein catheterization-appropriate and inappropriate placement. Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40:1941-9.

Yogen Singh. Use of echocardiography in the neonatal intensive care unit, Paediatrics and Child Health. 2022;32(9);351-6.

Shah MH, Roshan R. Mortality and morbidity of neonatal shock in premature babies in a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2021;8:1058-63.

EL-NawawyAA, Omar OM, Hassouna HM. Role of Inferior Vena Cava Parameters as Predictors of Fluid Responsiveness in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Prospective Study. J Child Sci. 2021;11:e49-54.

Elsayed Y, Wahab MGA, Mohamed A, Fadel NB, Bhombal S, et al. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) protocol for systematic assessment of the crashing neonate-expert consensus statement of the international crashing neonate working group. Euro J Pediat. 2023;182:53-66.

Orso D, Paoli I, Piani T, Cilenti FL, Cristiani L, Guglielmo N. Accuracy of ultrasonographic measurements of inferior vena cava to determine fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Intensive Care Med. 2020;35(4):354-63.

Long E, Duke T, Oakley E, O‟Brien A, Sheridan B, Babl FE, et al. Pediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT): Does respiratory variation of inferior vena cava diameter predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously ventilating children with sepsis. Emerg Med Australasia. 2018;30(4):556-63.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Shafi, K., Dorjai, T., & Beigh, V. R. (2026). Point-of-care ultrasound-guided hemodynamic assessment and resuscitation in neonatal shock: a prospective observational study. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 13(6), 851–858. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20261524

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles