Pattern and risk factors of congenital anomalies among neonates born in Dhulikhel hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20252170Keywords:
Congenital anomalies, Risk factors, PreventionAbstract
Background: Congenital anomalies are structural, functional and metabolic disorders at birth. Though common, the aetiology is multi–factorial and vary depending upon the socio–cultural practice. The congenital malformation accounts for the leading cause of neonatal deaths, still births and abortions. This study aims to identify the prevalence, pattern and the risk factors associated with congenital anomalies in neonates born in Dhulikhel hospital.
Methods: This was a retrospective study which included all neonates born in Dhulikhel hospital with congenital anomalies during the period of 1st January 2018 till 31st December 2022. Data was collected from the institutional medical records and entered on SPSS 25.0 for analysis after obtaining the ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee.
Results: From a total of 14,046 deliveries, 132 (0.94%) neonates were found to have congenital anomalies; of which majority 84 (63.6%) were male, term neonates 100 (75.8%) with normal birth weight 116 (87.9%). Most of the mothers 109 (82.6%) and fathers 101 (76.5%) of the neonates were within age group 20 to 35 years. Of the total neonates with anomalies, 104 (78.8%) had single system involved while 28 (21.2%) had more than one system involved. The most frequent anomalies involved the cardiovascular system 35 (26.51%) followed by musculoskeletal system 34 (25.75%) and cleft lip and palate 25 (18.94%).
Conclusion: Congenital anomalies are an important cause of infant and childhood deaths, chronic illness, and disability. Therefore, strategies for early diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and prevention are crucial in preventing morbidity and mortality.
Metrics
References
World Health Organization. Congenital anomalies. Geneva: WHO. 2023.
Duan J, Ding R, Yu Y. Global and regional burden of congenital birth defects, 1990–2021: persistent healthcare disparities and emerging challenges from non-fatal health burden: BMJ Public Health 2025;3:1608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001608
Howson CP, Christianson AC, Modell B. Controlling birth defect: reducing the hidden toll of dying and disabled children in low – income countries. Dis Control Prior Proj. 2008;4:687.
Ekwochi U, Asinobi IN, Osuorah DCI. Pattern of Congenital Anomalies in Newborn: A 4 – year Surveillance of Newborns Delivered in a Tertiary Healthcare Facility in the South – East Nigeria. J Trop Pediatr. 2018;64(4):304-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmx067
Umar W, Salim AA, Putri DNCK. The Prevention upon the Congenital Anomalies Effect: A Comparative Study between Indonesia, the United Kingdom and the United States. Indonesian Comparative Law Review. 2019;2(1):39-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.2115
Chimah OU, Emeagui KN, Ajaegbu OC. Congenital malformations: Prevalence and characteristics of newborns admitted into Federal Medical Center, Asaba. Health Sci Rep. 2022;5(3):599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.599
World Health Organization, Regional Office for South East Asia: Birth defects in South – East Asia: a public health challenge: situation analysis. In. New Delhi. 2013.
Paudel P, Sunny AK, Gurung R. Burden and consequence of birth defects in Nepal–evidence from prospective cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21:81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02525-2
Ajao AE, Adeoye IA. Prevalence, risk factors and outcome of congenital anomalies among neonatal admissions in OGBOMOSO, Nigeria. BMC Pediatrics. 2019;19:88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1471-1
Magwesela FM, Rabiel H, Mung'ong'o CM. Pattern of congenital anomalies among pediatric surgical patients in a tertiary care hospital in northern Tanzania. World J Pediatr Surg. 2022;5(4):410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2021-000410
Adane F, Afework M, Seyoum G, Gebrie A. Prevalence and associated factors of birth defects among newborns in sub–Saharan African countries: a systematic review and meta – analysis. The Pan African Med J. 2020;36:19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2020.36.19.19411
Prevention and control of Birth Defects in South – East Asia Region. Strategic framework. 2017.
Shakya S, Upadhaya Subedi K, Mishra M. Incidence of Birth Defects among Live Born Neonates at Tertiary Level Maternity Hospital in Nepal. J Nepal Paedi Soc. 2022;42(2):36-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/jnps.v42i2.41093
Dongol SS, Sradanandha S, Shrestha S, Shrestha RPB, Poudyal P. Pattern and Risk Factor Associated with Congenital Anomalies Among Young Infants Admitted in Dhulikhel Hospital. Birat J Health Sci 2018;3(3)7:548-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/bjhs.v3i3.22173
Khadka M, Agarwal J, Shrestha R, Das D. Birth Defects among Newborns in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross – sectional Study. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022;60(251):588-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.6610
Shakya H, Maharjan M, Lakhey A. Prevalence and Pattern of Birth Defects in a Tertiary Hospital in Lalitpur, Nepal. Nepalese Medical J. 2022;5(2):606–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/nmj.v5i2.51762
Shrestha S, Shrestha A. Prevalence of Congenital Malformations among Babies Delivered at a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020;58(225):310-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.4985
Padmanabhan R, Venkatasubramania R, Heber A. Prevalence and Pattern of Congenital Malformations among Neonates in a Medical College Hospital – A Retrospective Study. Int J Sci Stud 2019;6(12):28-31.
Sarkar S, Patra C, Dasgupta MK, Nayek K, Karmakar PR. Prevalence of congenital anomalies in neonates and associated risk factors in a tertiary care hospital in eastern India. J Clin Neonatol. 2013;2(3):131-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4847.119998
El Koumi MA, Al Banna EA, Lebda I. Pattern of congenital anomalies in newborn: a hospital-based study. Pediatr Rep. 2013;5(1):5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/pr.2013.e5
Wills V, Abraham J, Sreedevi NS. Congenital anomalies: the spectrum of distribution and associated maternal risk factors in a tertiary teaching hospital. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(4):1555-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20171427
Silesh M, Lemma T, Fenta B, Biyazin T. Prevalence and Trends of Congenital Anomalies Among Neonates at Jimma Medical Center, Jimma, Ethiopia: A Three–Year Retrospective Study. Pediatric Health, Med Therap. 2021;12:61-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PHMT.S293285
Dewangan M, Ali SM, Firdaus U. Pattern of congenital anomalies and risk factors in newborn in a city of a developing country: An observational study. IP Int J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2016;2(4):152-5.
Dey S, Pal AC, Nandi MK, Agarwalla P. A study on prevalence and pattern of clinically recognisable congenital malformations in babies born in a rural medical college hospital in West Bengal, India. Int J Pediatr Res. 2018;5(11):557-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17511/ijpr.2018.i11.02
Shawky RM, Sadik DI. The role of genomics in prevention or reducing the impact of congenital malformations. Genet Couns. 2011;22(2):135-41.
Capatina D, Cozaru GC. Risk factors associated with congenital anomalies in children. ARS Medica Tomitana. 2015;2(21):105-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/arsm-2015-0029
Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P, Intarut N et al. WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal Newborn Health Research Network. Advanced maternal age and pregnancy outcomes: a multicountry assessment. BJOG. 2014;121(1):49‐56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12659
Lean SC, Derricott H, Jones RL, Heazell AEP. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta–analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):186287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186287
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
