Behind the hashtags: a review of Instagram posts on pediatric ADHD

Authors

  • Neha R. Mahindrakar S.S Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Davangere, Karnataka, India
  • Srutdi K. Natarajan Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Arundhati Negi Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, India
  • Varshil Prajapati GMERS Medical College, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
  • Vrunda Rajput GMERS Medical College, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
  • Sameena Tabassum Department of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Vansh Sharma GMERS Medical College, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20251772

Keywords:

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Child and adolescent psychiatric disorders, Digital media

Abstract

Social media has become an influential source of mental health information in recent years, raising concerns about the spread of misinformation. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of Instagram posts related to pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A total of 761 posts were analyzed across 10 popular hashtags, with data collected on content relevance, type, gender representation, content creators, and engagement metrics such as likes, comments, and follower counts. Relevance was assessed using criteria from the DSM-5 and CDC guidelines. Only 31% of posts were found to be relevant to ADHD, with a majority being educational in nature. ADHD coaches were identified as the most frequent content creators. Gender representation in the posts represented females more than males. The overall engagement rate was calculated to be 16%. These findings highlight the widespread presence of potentially unreliable ADHD-related content on Instagram. Physicians must recognize the influence of such platforms on public health literacy and take proactive steps to counter misinformation, as it may contribute to misdiagnosis, inappropriate management, and confusion among patients and caregivers.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Danielson ML, Claussen AH, Bitsko RH. ADHD prevalence among U.S. children and adolescents in 2022: diagnosis, severity, co-occurring disorders, and treatment. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2024;53(3):343–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2024.2335625

Sultanbayeva G, Kulsariyeva A, Lozhnikova O, Kalibekuly D, Tolegen B. Negative Influence of Incorrect Information on Facebook User Behaviour: Kazakhstan Case. Rotura–Revista de Comunicação, Cultura e Artes. 2025;5(1):37-54.

Aschbrenner KA, Naslund JA, Grinley T, Bienvenida JCM, Bartels SJ, Brunette M. A survey of online and mobile technology use at peer support agencies. Psychiatr Q. 2018;89(3):539–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-017-9561-4

Birnbaum ML, Ernala SK, Rizvi AF, De Choudhury M, Kane JM. A collaborative approach to identifying social media markers of schizophrenia by employing machine learning and clinical appraisals. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(8):289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7956

Brunette MF, Achtyes E, Pratt S. Use of smartphones, computers and social media among people with SMI: opportunity for intervention. Community Ment Health J. 2019;55(6):973–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00431-7

Bucci S, Schwannauer M, Berry N. The digital revolution and its impact on mental health care. Psychol Psychother. 2019;92(2):277–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12222

Naslund JA, Aschbrenner KA, Marsch LA, Bartels SJ. Feasibility and acceptability of Facebook for health promotion among people with serious mental illness. Digit Health. 2016;2:1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616654822

Naslund JA, Bondre A, Torous J, Aschbrenner KA. Social media and mental health: benefits, risks, and opportunities for research and practice. J Technol Behav Sci. 2020;5(3):245–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-020-00134-x

Yeung A, Ng E, Abi-Jaoude E. TikTok and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a cross-sectional study of social media content quality. Can J Psychiatry. 2022;67(12):899–906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437221082854

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):1000097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Harshitha A, Bheemavarapu B, Kaur R, Madhu KI, Mahajan A. A cross-sectional study on Instagram posts on autism. Int J Med Rev Case Rep. 2024;1:43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/IJMRCR.172-1686115799

Karasavva V, Miller C, Groves N, Montiel A, Canu W, Mikami A. A double-edged hashtag: evaluation of #ADHD-related TikTok content and its associations with perceptions of ADHD. PLoS One. 2025;20(3):319335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319335

Verma S, Sinha SK. How evidence-based is the “hashtag ADHD test” (#adhdtest): a cross-sectional content analysis of TikTok videos on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) screening. Australas Psychiatry. 2024;2:87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562241291956

Brown AI. ADHD, academics, and communities: who are the “ADHD experts”? In: Bertilsdotter Rosqvist H, Jackson-Perry D, eds. The Palgrave Handbook of Research Methods and Ethics in Neurodiversity Studies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2024: 329–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66127-3_23

Skogli EW, Teicher MH, Andersen PN, Hovik KT, Øie M. ADHD in girls and boys–gender differences in co-existing symptoms and executive function measures. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-298

Downloads

Published

2025-06-16

How to Cite

Mahindrakar, N. R., Natarajan, S. K., Negi, A., Prajapati, V., Rajput, V., Tabassum, S., & Sharma, V. (2025). Behind the hashtags: a review of Instagram posts on pediatric ADHD. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 12(7), 1273–1276. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20251772

Issue

Section

Review Articles