Neurosonogram in high-risk neonates delivered in a rural tertiary care hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20251870Keywords:
High risk neonates, Neurosonogram, Short term follow upAbstract
Background: A neurosonogram can detect both congenital and acquired brain lesions in neonates. Abnormal neurosonogram findings in high-risk neonates range from 3% to 47%. The aim was to study the neurosonogram findings in high-risk neonates and to associate them with maternal and neonatal risk factors.
Methods: Seventy-nine high-risk neonates delivered in this rural tertiary care hospital were included. Maternal demographic data along with neonatal examination findings at birth, neurosonogram, investigations, treatment given and short-term follow-up till discharge were entered in a pre-validated proforma. In cases with abnormal neurosonogram findings, a repeat neurosonogram was done between the 8th to 28th day of life, and the findings were recorded. Statistical analysis used: The Fischer exact test was used for parameters on a categorical scale. A p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The overall prevalence of abnormal neurosonogram findings was 11.4% with cysts, midline shifts, intraventricular haemorrhage, germinal matrix haemorrhage and hydrocephalus being the most common intracranial abnormalities detected. Factors associated with abnormal neurosonogram in high risk neonates were premature rupture of membranes, polyhydramnios, APGAR score less than seven at five and ten minutes, positive blood culture, low platelet count, low hematocrit, hypocalcaemia, low pH and high pCO2. These high risk neonates with abnormal neurosonogram had a longer hospital stay of more than 10 days and a mortality of 11.1%.
Conclusions: Neurosonography is an effective screening modality for early detection of intracranial abnormalities in high-risk neonates. Morbidity and mortality were more in high risk neonates with abnormal neurosonogram.
Metrics
References
Rao R, Taksande A, Saqqaf SA, Yedve S, Kumar S. Role of Neurosonography in Critically Ill Neonates in NICU. J Neonatol. 2022;36(3):194-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09732179221113674
UNICEF India. Ending preventable maternal, newborn, and child deaths. New Delhi: UNICEF India. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/india/topics/childrens-rights. Accessed 01 June 2025.
Abdelmotaleb GS, Soliman AM, Abed NT. Role of Cranial Ultrasound in High Risk Full-Term Neonates. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2021;82(4):714-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2021.152977
Kinikar U, Dhanawade S. Study of cranial ultrasound its correlation with perinatal risk factors and its outcome in preterm neonates admitted to Neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Rev Int J Pediatr Res. 2018;5(4):169-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17511/ijpr.2018.i04.03
Cha JH, Choi N, Kim J, Lee HJ, Na JY, Park H-K. Cystic Periventricular Echogenicity Worsens Developmental Outcomes of Very-Low-Birth Weight Infants with Intraventricular Hemorrhage-A Nationwide Cohort Study. J Clin Med 2022;11(19):5886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195886
One.Park HA, Hwang JH. The Risk Factors of Periventricular Echogenicity among Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Neonatal Med Kor Society Neonatol. 2020;27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5385/nm.2020.27.2.51
Chari A, Mallucci C, Whitelaw A, Kristian A. Intraventricular hemorrhage and posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation: moving beyond CSF diversion. Childs Nerv Syst. 2021; 37(11):3375-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05206-8
Fanaroff AA, Fanaroff JM. Klaus and Fanaroff's Care of the High-Risk Neonate, 8th edition, Elsevier. 2020.
Jha R, Singh A, Jha R. Cranial ultrasound in high risk preterm. J Paediatr Assoc India. 2017;6(1):26-32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2667-3592.301303
Allu S, Rao TR, Cherukuri AS. Neurosonogram for cranial abnormalities of neonates. Int Arch. Integr. Med. 2019;6(9):1-6.
Prithviraj D, Reddy B, Reddy R, Shruthi B. Neurosonogram in critically ill neonates in neonatal intensive care unit. Int J Scientific Study. 2016;4(1):124-8.