DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20170702

Cord C-reactive protein as a marker for early onset neonatal sepsis children

Reeba Patrick, Aswathy Rajan, Ashvij Shriyan

Abstract


Background: Of the 2.8 million neonatal deaths, worldwide, 0.43 million is contributed by sepsis alone. The objective of this study was to determine the levels of umbilical cord C-reactive protein and assess the suitability of this test in diagnosing early onset sepsis in newborns born to mothers with no risk factors for intrapartum infection. To determine the influence of other factors such as parity, birth weight and mode of delivery on the levels of cord CRP.

Methods: CRP levels in cord blood were estimated for 103 consecutive newborns delivered at a tertiary care teaching hospital. These babies were monitored for signs of sepsis for 72 hours and were later followed up with serum CRP and blood cultures.

Results: A prospective cohort study of 103 consecutive newborns were taken of which 53.4% were male babies. Comparison of cord CRP levels of baseline characteristics revealed significant elevation in babies born to multipara mothers (p = 0.0028) and in low birth weight babies (p = 0.05), while there were no significant changes in different modes of delivery. The mean cord CRP of the study group was 0.694±0.2979. Out of 104 babies, 16 had elevated cord CRP (above 1.1mg/l) of these, 12 babies were later confirmed to have sepsis. The mean cord CRP level in babies with EOS was 1.3±0.255 (p = 0.001). A sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 90.9%, positive predictive value of 75% and negative predictive value of 100% was determined.

Conclusions: This study confirms that cord CRP is an effective marker to predict EONS. An optimal concentration of cord CRP > 1.1 mg/L has maximal sensitivity and specificity to predict EONS.


Keywords


C - reactive protein, Neonatal sepsis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Shefali OZA, Lawn JE, Hogan DR, Mathers C, Cousens SN. Neonatal cause-of-death estimates for the early and late neonatal periods for 194 countries: 2000-2013. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93:19-28.

The WHO young infants study group. Bacterial etiology of serious infections in young infants in developing countries: results of a multicentric study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999;18:S17-22.

Jajoo M, Kapoor K, Garg LK, Manchanda V, Mittal SK. To study the incidence and risk factors of early onset neonatal sepsis in an outborn NICU of India. J Clin Neonatol. 2015;4:91-5.

Hofer N, Müller W, Resch B. Neonatal bacterial infection. The role of C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. In Tech; Chiesa C, Pellegrini G, Panero A, Osborn JF, Signore F, Assumma M, Pacifico L.C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin-6, and Procalcitonin in the Immediate Postnatal Period: Influence of Illness Severity, Risk Status, Antenatal and Perinatal Complications, and Infection. Clin Chemistry. 2015;49(1):60-8.

Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE. Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, 5th edition; 2012.

Mathai E, Christopher U, Mathai M, Jana AK, Rose D, Bergstrom S. Is C-reactive protein level useful in differentiating infected from uninfected neonates among those at risk of infection? Indian Pediatr. 2004;41:895-900.

Yoon BH, Romero R, Shim JY, Shim SS, Kim CJ, Jun JK. C-reactive protein in umbilical cord blood: a simpleand widely available clinical method to assess therisk of amniotic fluid infection and funisitis. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003;14:85-90.

Khan A, Ali Z. Normal ranges for acute phase reactants (interleukin-6, tumour necrosisFactor-alpha and C-reactive protein) in umbilical cord blood of healthy term neonates at the mount hope women’s hospital, Trinidad. West Indian Med J. 2003;63(5):466-9.

Somaiah, Vamsidhar, Sujitha, Rao M, Srikanth KA. Usefulness of CRP in differentiation infected from uninfected neonates as among those at risk of infection. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2014;3(7):1724-31.

Trevisanuto D, Doglioni N, Altinier S, Plebani M, Zanardi V. High sensitivity CRP in umbilical cord of small-for-gestational-age neonates. Neonatol. 2007;91(3):186-9.