Nasal challenges: managing metallic foreign bodies: a case series

Authors

  • Himanshu Thakkar Department of ENT and Dentistry, Dr Thakkar’s ENT and Dental Surgical Hospital, Rajkot, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20251479

Keywords:

Metallic foreign body, Safety pin, Epistaxis, Metal nut, Metal screw, Endoscope

Abstract

Foreign bodies within the external nose, though uncommon, pose potential risks including chronic inflammation and localized infection, despite the inert nature of most metallic materials. Prompt identification and appropriate removal are essential to mitigate complications. This report presents three clinical cases involving embedded nasal foreign bodies, each successfully diagnosed via endoscopic examination and managed through an open rhinoplasty approach.

The open rhinoplasty technique offers a distinct advantage by ensuring optimal surgical exposure while preserving aesthetic outcomes, surpassing the cosmetic limitations associated with conventional incisions. Although literature on nasal foreign bodies remains limited-often focusing on durations ranging from three months to five years—these cases underscore the importance of early and precise diagnosis. Radiographic evaluation, particularly with computed tomography (CT), remains the gold standard for accurate localization of intranasal foreign bodies. Upon confirmation, surgical extraction is typically warranted, with endoscopic-assisted methods increasingly favored for their minimally invasive nature and lower procedural risk. In asymptomatic individuals, conservative management with regular radiographic monitoring may be considered as an alternative to immediate intervention.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ryu CH, Jang YJ, Kim JS, Song HM. Removal of a metallic foreign body embedded in the external nose via open rhinoplasty approach, International J Oral Maxill Surg. 2008;37(12):1148-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.09.010

Kadish HA, Corneli HM. Removal of nasal foreign bodies in the pediatric population, The American J Emerg Med. 1997;15(1):54-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-6757(97)90049-8

Dann L, Doody J, Howard R, Blackburn C, Russell J, Barrett M. Nasal foreign bodies in the paediatric emergency department. Ir J Med Sci. 2019;188(4):1401-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-02000-z

Jungbauer WN, Shih M, Nguyen SA, Clemmens CS. Comparison of pediatric nasal foreign body removal by care setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;158:111162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111162

Gupta R, Nyakunu RP, Kippax JR. Is the emergency department management of ENT foreign bodies successful. A tertiary care hospital experience in Australia. Ear Nose Throat J. 2016;95(3):113-6.

Patil PM, Anand R. Nasal foreign bodies: a review of management strategies and a clinical scenario presentation. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2011;4(1):53-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1272902

Kareemi H, Gustafson J, Giles SM. The occasional nasal foreign body. Can J Rural Med. 2019;24(2):65-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/CJRM.CJRM_16_18

Baranowski K, Al Aaraj MS, Sinha V. Nasal Foreign Body. StatPearls. 2021.

Hills RW, Brown JC, Brownstein D. Barotrauma: a complication of positive pressure for nasal foreign body removal in a pediatric patient. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52(6):623-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.08.025

McRae D, Premachandra DJ, Gatland DJ. Button batteries in the ear, nose and cervical esophagus: a destructive foreign body. J Otolaryngol. 1989;18(6):317-9.

Bakshi SS, Coumare VN, Priya M, Kumar S. Long-Term Complications of Button Batteries in the Nose. J Emerg Med. 2016;50(3):485-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.10.041

Downloads

Published

2025-05-26

How to Cite

Thakkar, H. (2025). Nasal challenges: managing metallic foreign bodies: a case series. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 12(6), 975–979. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20251479

Issue

Section

Case Series