Agreement among glass mercury thermometers, infrared thermometers and digital thermometer temperature recordings in febrile under-five children

Authors

  • Sylvia T. Echendu Department of Paediatrics, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4582-2502
  • Ernest N. Anyabolu Department of Internal Medicine, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Awka, Anambra, Nigeria
  • Esther N. Umeadi Department of Paediatrics, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra, Nigeria; Department of Paediatrics, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5863-7125
  • Kenneth N. Okeke Department of Paediatrics, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra, Nigeria; Department of Paediatrics, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria
  • Boniface E. Chukwujekwu Department of Paediatrics, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra, Nigeria
  • Njideka C. Uchefuna Department of Paediatrics, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra, Nigeria
  • Ann O. Ikeabbah Department of Paediatrics, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2206-3091
  • Nkechinyere G. Obichukwu Department of Paediatrics, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra, Nigeria
  • Chigozie K. onyeje Department of Paediatrics, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20251465

Keywords:

Agreement, Digital thermometer, Glass mercury thermometer, Infrared thermometer, Temperature

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the degree of agreement between the temperature readings of a glass mercury thermometer (GMT), a digital thermometer (DT) and an infrared thermometer (IR) in paediatric patients. This was a comparative study conducted at a tertiary institution in Nnewi, Anambra State, Southeast Nigeria. One hundred febrile children <5 years of age were recruited via convenience sampling.

Methods: Temperatures were measured via an axillary GMT, an axillary DT and a noncontact forehead IR thermometer. Data were compared among the three methods via a 2×2 contingency table, receiver operating curve (ROC) and Bland Altman plot with GMT as the standard.

Results: There was a greater significant correlation between GMT and DT (r=0.901, p=0.001) than between GMT and IR (r=0.695, p=0.001). Bland Altman plots revealed that IR and DT could be used interchangeably with GMT with an arithmetic mean of 1.1°C, confidence interval of 0.9359 to 1.1581, limits of agreement of -0.1–2.1 (37.4°C–39.6°C), p<0.001, outliers 3% at 1.96 SD and arithmetic mean of -0.1°C, confidence interval of -0.1337-0.00427, limits of agreement of -0.7–0.5 (36.8°C–38.0°C), p=0.037 and outliers 4% at 1.96 SD with GMT as the standard against IR and DT, respectively. The area under the receiver operator curve values were 0.811 and 0.923 for GMT versus IR and GMT versus DT, respectively.

Conclusions: Digital and infrared temperature readings are in reasonable agreement with a glass mercury thermometer and both can be used interchangeably with a glass mercury thermometer. Compared with infrared thermometers, digital thermometers are more closely related to glass mercury thermometers.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Kliegman RM, Behrman RE, Jenson HB, Stanton BM. Nelson textbook of pediatrics e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2007.

Rahman N, Kasem FB, Islam MR, Islam MR, Sultana R, Matin A. “ Comparison between mercury and liquid crystal forehead thermometer for measurement of body temperature. J Saheed Suhrawardy Med Coll. 2012;4:60-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jssmc.v4i2.14421

Holtzclaw BJ. “Circadian rhythm and homeostatic stability in thermoregulation”. Biological Research for Nurs. 2001;2:221-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109980040100200402

Sund-Levander M, Forsberg C, Wahren LK. Normal oral, rectal, tympanic and axillary body temperature in adult men and women: a systematic literature review. Scand J. Caring Sci. 2002;16:122-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00069.x

Avner JR, Baker MD. Management of fever in infants and children. Emera Med Clin N Am. 2002;20:49-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8627(03)00051-8

Teller J, Bernasconi R, Simonetti GD, Lava SA. Performance of axillary and rectal temperature measurement in private paediatric practice. Eur J Paediatr. 2019:178:1501-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-019-03438-0

Woyessa AB, Ayele W, Ahimed A, Nega A. Investigation of acute febrile illness outbreak Asyaita and Dupti districts, Afar region, Ethiopia. Retrovirol. 2012;9:46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4690-9-S1-P46

Chiappini. update of Italian Paediatric Society Guidelines for management of fever in children. J Pediatr. 2017;180:177-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.09.043

Opersteny E. Precision, sensitivity and patient preference of a noninvasive thermometer in a pediatric surgical acute care setting. J paediatr Nurs 2017;35:36-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2017.02.003

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Fever in under-fives: assessment and initial management in clinical guideline NG143. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance//ng. Accessed on 21 November 2014.

Ng D, Lam J, Chow K.” Childhood fever revisited. Hong Kong Med J 2002; 8:39-43.

Adhi M, Hasan R, Noman F, Mahmood SF, Naqvia A, Rizvi AU. “Range for normal body temperature in the general population of Pakistan.” J Pakistal Med Association. 2008;58:558-84.

Çultu Ö, Yildirim M, Ceyham. “ Comparing body temperature measurement by mothers and physicians using mercury-in-glass digital mercury and infrared tympanic membrane thermometers in healthy newborn babies”. Turkish J Paediatrics. 2008;50:354-58.

Zeal JD. Thermospot-a non-invasive hypothermia indicator for neonates, infants and children. Carbone consultation. 1999.

Periasami V. Diagnostic accuracy of digital thermometer compared to mercury in glass thermometer for measuring temperature in children. Int J Contemp Paediatr. 2017;4:1476-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20172689

Chatproedprai S, Heamawatanachai K, Tempark T, Wananukul SA. Comparative study of three different methods of temperature measurements in children. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016;99:142-9.

Wang G, Wang W, Li K, Liu H. A digital thermometer with fast response and high precision. In2014 7th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics 2014: 504-510). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/BMEI.2014.7002827

Anigwe FC, Mbanuzuru AV, Obi-Okaro AC, Edeh GC, Awugosi MC, Akwuobi GU. Riding under the influence: unravelling substance abuse patterns among motorcyclists in South-Eastern Nigeria. International J Res Med Sci. 2024;12(5):1408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20241220

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A. Statistical power analysis using G* power 3.1: Test for correlation and regression analyses. Beh Res Method. 2009;41:1149-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

World Health Organization. Handbook for IMCI integrated management of childhood illnesses. World Health Organization 2005. Avaialble at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42939. Accessed on 21 December 2024.

Chan YH. Biostatistics 104: Correlational Analysis. Singapore Med J 2003; 44:614-9.

El-Rhadhi AS. Determining fever in children. The search for an ideal thermometer. Br J Nurs 2014;5:91-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2014.23.2.91

Schreiber S. reported that a Galinstan thermometer is more accurate than a digital thermometer for the measurement of body temperature in children. Paediatr Emergency Care. 2013;29:197-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182809c29

Sollai S. Performance of noncontact infrared thermometer in healthy newborn. BMJ Open. 2016;6:2008695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008695

Gerensea H, Murugan R. Is there significant difference between digital and glass mercury thermometer. Advances in nursing. 2016;2(1):3474503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3474503

Khorshid L, Eser I, Zaybak A, Yapucu U. Comparing Mercury-in-glass, tympanic and disposable thermometers in measuring body temperature in healthy young people. J Clinical Nurs. 2005;14:495-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01076.x

Yvonne M, Shevchuck B.”Fever” in therapeutics choices for minor ailments. Canadian pharmacists Association. 2013: 85-92.

Chaturvedi D, Vilhekar Y, Chaturvedi P, Bharambe Ms. ‘Comparison of axillary temperature with rectal or oral temperature and determination of optimum placement time in children. Indian Paediat. 2004;41:600-3.

Fendall CP, Crutchley EA, editors. The Diary of Benjamin Newton. Cambridge University Press; 2013.

Imani R, Salehi S, Habibian R, Sadeghi B, Hatamipour K. Comparative study of measuring body temperature by mercury and digital thermometer. Iranian J Nurs. 2009;21:9-16.

Chand MS. A comparative study on difference in the manual and electronic recording of vital signs in patients admitted in CTVS-ICU and CCU of advanced cardiac center at PGIMER. Chandigarh in year. 2010: 11.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-26

How to Cite

Echendu, S. T., Anyabolu, E. N., Umeadi, E. N., Okeke, K. N., Chukwujekwu, B. E., Uchefuna, N. C., Ikeabbah, A. O., Obichukwu, N. G., & onyeje, C. K. (2025). Agreement among glass mercury thermometers, infrared thermometers and digital thermometer temperature recordings in febrile under-five children. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 12(6), 890–898. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20251465

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles