Congenital urogenital anomalies detected in foetal autopsies: a case series
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20251105Keywords:
Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract, Renal agenesis, Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease, Pearson syndrome, Genetic counselling, Fetal megacytisAbstract
Foetal anomalies are congenital defects that can affect multiple organ systems, including the urogenital system. Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) are a significant subset of these disorders, often leading to severe complications that impact foetal viability and affect postnatal outcomes. Early prenatal detection through imaging and genetic testing plays a crucial role in managing these conditions. Despite advances, foetal autopsy remains the gold standard for confirming diagnoses, identifying other associated anomalies, and understanding the embryological developmental basis of these defects. This autopsy series was conducted at the department of pathology, Sri Ramachandra institute of higher education and research, to analyse urogenital anomalies detected in foetal autopsies over a four-year period (January 2020-January 2024). Out of 352 foetal autopsies, 19 cases exhibited urogenital anomalies. We present a detailed analysis of five representative cases, which include unilateral renal agenesis associated with pentalogy of Cantrell, autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD), Pearson syndrome with renal involvement, foetal megacystis, and bilateral renal agenesis with oligohydramnios (Potter syndrome). Each case highlights the complexity of urogenital malformations, their systemic implications, and the necessity for genetic counselling. These findings reinforce the importance of foetal autopsy in validating prenatal imaging and genetic results. Autopsy data provide valuable insights into the anatomical and pathological characteristics of these anomalies, aiding in the accurate classification of congenital disorders. Additionally, this series emphasises the role of genetic counselling in assisting parents with recurrence risk assessment and future planning. By integrating prenatal diagnostic techniques with post-mortem findings, this series emphasises the need for a multidisciplinary approach in managing congenital urogenital anomalies, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy, management, and family support strategies.
Metrics
References
Talati AN, Webster CM, Vora NL. Prenatal genetic considerations of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT). Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(9):679-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5536
Risdon RA. The urinary system Keeling J. Fetal and Neonatal Pathology. 3rd ed. London: Springer Verlag. 2001;525-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3682-8_19
Murugapoopathy V, Gupta IR. A primer on congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tracts (CAKUT). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020;15(5):723-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.12581019
Janjua HS, Lam SK, Gupta V, Krishna S. Congenital anomalies of the kidneys, collecting system, bladder, and urethra. Pediatr Rev. 2019;40(12):619-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2018-0242
Tain Y-L, Luh H, Lin C-Y, Hsu C-N. Incidence and risks of congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract in newborns: A population-based case–control study in Taiwan. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(5):e2659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002659
Daneman A, Alton D. Radiographic manifestations of renal anomalies. Radiol Clin N Am. 1991;29(2):351-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-8389(22)02702-6
Dressler GR. The cellular basis of kidney development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006;22:509-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104340
Little MH, McMahon AP. Mammalian kidney development: principles, progress, and projections. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4(5):a008300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a008300
Nicolaou N, Renkema KY, Bongers EM, Giles RH, Knoers NV. Genetic, environmental, and epigenetic factors involved in CAKUT. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015;11(12):720-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2015.140
Avni FE, Garel L. Imaging and classification of congenital cystic renal diseases. World J Radiol. 2015;7(12):361-73.
Zerres K, Rudnik-Schoneborn S, Deget F, Holtkamp U, Brodehl J, Geisert J, et al. Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease in 115 children: clinical presentation, course, and influence of gender. Acta Paediatr. 1996;85(4):437-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14056.x
Pearson HA, Lobel JS, Kocoshis SA, Naiman JL, Windmiller J, Lammi, AT, et al. A new syndrome of refractory sideroblastic anemia with vacuolization of marrow precursors and exocrine pancreatic dysfunction. J Pediatr. 1979;95(6):976-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(79)80286-3
Fontanella F, Duin LK, Cloquet M, Peralta CF, McAuliffe FM. Outcome of fetal megacystis diagnosed in the first trimester: a systematic review. Prenat Diagn. 2016;36(1):41-8.
Sebire NJ, Souka A, Skentou H, Geerts L, Nicolaides KH. First trimester megacystis at 10-14 weeks of gestation: chromosomal defects and outcome according to bladder length. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;14(5):327-30.
Potter EL. Facial characteristics of infants with bilateral renal agenesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1946;51:885-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(16)39968-9
Winyard PJ, Chitty LS. Dysmorphology and the antenatal origins of CAKUT. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014;29(4):617-33.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
