School based screening tools for childhood obesity: a comparison of TSFT, WHR and BMI


  • Sujaya Mukhopadhyay Department of Pediatrics, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Prasun Bhattacharjee Department of Pediatrics, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Payas Joshi Department of Pediatrics, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India



Adolescents, BMI, Obesity, Over-weight, TSFT, Vadodara city, WHR


Background: Obesity is an emerging health problem in children and adolescents. Various screening tools are there for assessment of nutritional status and this study was done to compare various methods to screen for obesity and overweight in adolescents that can be used during school health check-up.

Methods: This study was conducted in the urban schools of Vadodara city. 609 students were included in the study.

Results: Maximum students were in the age group of 16-18 year of which 57.9% were males and 42.03 % females. By using BMI, 4.1% students were found to be obese and 12.8% overweight. 10% students had WHR above the cut-off levels. In 11.3% TSFT was above 90th centile.

Conclusions: Comparison between the three parameters done using ANNOVA, shows that TSFT is better than BMI in detecting Obesity.    


IAP national task force for childhood prevention of adult diseases: childhood obesity. Indian Pediatrics. 2004;562:41.

Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R. For the IASO International obesity task force, obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obesity Reviews. 2004;5(1):84-5.

Prevalence of overweight in urban Indian adolescent school children. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2002;57:185-90.

Kapil U, Singh P, Pathak P, Dwivedi SN, Bhasin S. Prevalence of obesity amongst affluent adolescent school children in Delhi. Indian Pediatrics. 2002;39:449-52.

24 CDC Growth Charts: United States, Developed by the National Center for Health Statistics in collaboration with the National Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. 2000.

WHO expert consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. The Lancet. 2004;363:157-63.

IAP growth monitoring guidelines for children from birth to 18 years. Indian Pediatrics. 2007;44:187-97.

Waist circumference and waist-hip ratio. report of a WHO Expert Consultation, Geneva. Available at Accessed on 8 December 2008.

WHO expert committee, physical status - the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Recommended reference data. WHO tech rep series. 1995;854:439-52.

Hingorjo MR, Syed S, Qureshi MA. Overweight and obesity in students of a dental college of Karachi: lifestyle influence and measurement by an appropriate anthropometric index. J Pak Med Asso. 2009;59:528.

Mehru N, Ratanoo L, Gupta PP, Gupta MK. Body mass index and skinfold thickness measurements as indicators of obesity in adolescents. Int J Biomed Advance Res. 2016;7(5):235-41.

Goyal RK, Shah VN, Saboo BD, Phatak SR, Shah NN, Gohel MC, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in indian adolescent school going children: its relationship with socioeconomic status and associated lifestyle factors. J Assoc Physicians India. 2010;58:151-8.

Chhatwal J, Verma M, Riar SK. Obesity among pre-adolescent and adolescents of a developing country (India). Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2004;13(3):231-5.






Original Research Articles