Feasibility of three window point of care ultrasound in endotracheal tube positioning in the level III pediatric intensive care unit

Kanchan S. Channawar; K. Sri Harsha; Penubolu Kiranmayee

doi:10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20243078

Authors

Kanchan S. Channawar Department of Paediatrics, Kamineni Academy of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana state, India
K. Sri Harsha Department of Paediatrics, Kamineni Academy of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana state, India
Penubolu Kiranmayee Department of Paediatrics, Kamineni Academy of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana state, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20243078

Keywords:

ETT, Endotracheal intubation, Ultrasonography, Capnography

Abstract

Background: Proper placement of an endotracheal tube (ETT) is an important and very crucial step in airway management. Unrecognized esophageal intubation leads to catastrophic consequences. The standard elements of confirmation have significant limitations. There is no universally accepted gold standard. Recent literature has shown that point of care ultrasound (POCUS) may be helpful in confirming the correct ETT placement and positioning.

Methods: We enrolled a prospective, convenience sample from all intubated patients in our pediatric ICU. As part of standard care unit protocol all patients had X-ray to confirm ETT position. Airway ultrasonography was performed immediately after intubation once ETT is secured and patient is connected to ventilator. Patient stability was insured before performing USG. The position of ETT will be confirmed by five-point ultrasonography window one at trachea, bilateral lung sliding and bilateral diaphragmatic movements. Tracheal ultrasonography will be perform using a SonoSite M-turbo linear and curvilinear probe (13-6 and 2-5 MHz).

Results: The paediatric patients enrolled in the study were 40 in number. Most of the paediatric population i.e. 47.50% were in between 1-5 years of age The three‑window POCUS method correctly identified the ETT to be either in the trachea or oesophageal in all 40 instances, (Correct or incorrect or bronchial) sensitivity of 100.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.3-100.0%) when compared to X-ray chest. There were no adverse events during ultrasound. The mean time required for three-window POCUS was 69.9±27.01 seconds as compared to X-ray 3337.5±1374.24 seconds which was statistically highly significant (p<0.0000001).

Conclusions: POCUS is a very good bedside tool for detection and monitoring of ETT position in children in emergency setups. POCUS has very good sensitivity in detecting ETT position when compared to CXR. The time consumed to carry out POCUS is statistically significantly less than CXR and hence an effective lifesaving tool.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Grmec Š. Comparison of three different methods to confirm tracheal tube placement in emergency intubation. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(6):701-4.

Salem MR. Verification of endotracheal tube position. Anesthesiol Clin North America. 2001;19(4):813-39.

Sayre MR, O’Connor RE, Atkins DL, Billi JE, Callaway CW, Shuster M, et al. Part 2: evidence evaluation and management of potential or perceived conflicts of interest: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010;122(3):S657-64.

American College of Emergency Physicians. Verification of Endotracheal Tube Placement. Policy statement. Vol. 54. 2009.

Lakhal K, Delplace X, Cottier JP, Tranquart F, Sauvagnac X, Mercier C, et al. The feasibility of ultrasound to assess subglottic diameter. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(3):611-4.

Sustić A, Miletić D, Protić A, Ivancić A, Cicvarić T. Can ultrasound be useful for predicting the size of a left double-lumen bronchial tube? Tracheal width as measured by ultrasonography versus computed tomography. J Clin Anesth. 2008;20(4):247-52.

American College of Emergency Physicians. Verification of Endotracheal Tube Placement. Vol. 68, Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2016;152.

Lahham S, Wilson SP, Turner E, Subeh M, Rosen MA, Youssefian A, et al. Three ‑ Window Ultrasonography Confirmation of Endotracheal Tube Placement. Res Cardiovasc Med. 2018;7(4):192-6.

Kad N, Sikarwar A, Kumar V, Kumari D. A Study to Confirm the Position of Endotracheal Tube using Ultrasonography and Standard Auscultation Method. IJCMR. 2018;5(12):12-6.

Adi O, Kok MS, Farid S, Wahab A. Focused airway ultrasound: an armamentarium in future airway management. J Emerg Crit Care Med. 2019;3(31):1-10.

Chou HC, Chong KM, Sim SS, Ma MHM, Liu SH, Chen NC, et al. Real-time tracheal ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2013;84(12):1708-12.

Werner SL, Smith CE, Goldstein JR, Jones RA, Cydulka RK. Pilot study to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography in confirming endotracheal tube placement. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(1):75-80.

Kabil AE, Ewis AM, Al-ashkar AM, Abdelatif MAA, Nour MO. Real-time tracheal ultrasonography for confirming endotracheal tube placement. Egypt J Bronchol. 2018;12(3):323-8.

Kerrey BT, Geis GL, Quinn AM, Hornung RW, Ruddy RM. A Prospective Comparison of Diaphragmatic Ultrasound and Chest Radiography to Determine Endotracheal Tube Position in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Pediatrics. 2009;123(6):e1039 LP-e1044.

Kendir OT, Bilen HLYS, Kay SSG-, Tolunay İ, Ozkay AK, Yildizdas RD. The Importance of Bedside Ultrasonography in Conforming the Location of Endotracheal Tube. Signa Vitae. 2019;15(2):30-3.

Chou HC, Tseng WP, Wang CH, Ma MHM, Wang HP, Huang PC, et al. Tracheal rapid ultrasound exam (T.R.U.E.) for confirming endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation. Resuscitation. 2011;82(10):1279-84.