DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20221369
Published: 2022-05-25

Comparison of effect of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics, amethocaine and 4% lignocaine in alleviating pain during venous cannulation in children up to three years

Rakesh Sharma, Pancham Kumar, Ambika Sood, Satendra Gupta

Abstract


Background: Intense anxiety experienced by the parents and their children regarding venous cannulation may result in non-adherence to the recommended procedure. The aim of present study was to compare the effects of eutectic mixture of topical anesthetics, amethocaine and 4% lignocaine on pain responses during venous cannulation in children up to 3 years.

Methods: The present hospital based, prospective, randomized comparative study was conducted from December 2019 to November 2020 at KNH and IGMC, Shimla. The study population was divided in to two groups, group I (less than one month) and group II (one month to three years) and were further divided into three groups (amethocaine, EMLA and 4% lignocaine). NIPS and FLACC score for 3 events (pre procedural, immediately after cannulation and three minutes after cannulation) were noted.

Results: 99 children were enrolled in our study (59 in group one and 40 in group two) and all were fulfilling inclusion criteria. NIPS score was highest for lignocaine before, immediate and after cannula followed by EMLA and was least for amethocaine. FLACC score was highest for lignocaine before, immediate and after cannulation. FLACC score was lowest for amethocaine, immediately and after cannulation and for EMLA before cannulation.

Conclusions: Amethocaine significantly reduces the pain response as compared to EMLA and 4% lignocaine group specifically immediately after cannulation and three minutes post cannulation.


Keywords


Comparison, EMLA, Amethocaine and 4% lignocaine, Pain during venous cannulation, Children up to 3 years

Full Text:

PDF

References


Mitchell A, Boss BJ. Adverse effects of pain on the nervous system of newborns and young children: a review of the literature. J Neurosci Nurs. 2002;34(5): 228.

Lawrence J, Alcock D, Kay J, McGrath PJ. The development of a tool to assess neonatal pain. J Pain Sympt Manage. 1991;6(3):194.

Rogers TL, Ostrow CL. The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children. J Pediatr Nurs. 2004;19(1):33-9.

Gleiss J, Stutten G. Morphologic and functional development of the skin. In: Physiology of the perinatal period. New York; Appleton - Century Crofts: 1970; 2:889-906.

Molodecka J, Stenhouse C, Jones JM, Tomlinson A. Comparison of percutaneous anaesthesia for venous cannulation after topical application of either amethocaine or EMLA cream. Br J Anaest. 1994; 72(2):174-6.

Choy L, Collier J, Watson AR. Comparison of lignocaine‐prilocaine cream and Amethocaine gel for local analgesia before venipuncture in children. Acta Paediatr. 1999;88(9):961-4.

Browne J, Awad I, Plant R, McAdoo J, Shorten G. Topical Amethocaine is Superior to EMLA for intravenous cannulation. Canadian J Anesth. 1999; 46(11):1014-8.

Rømsing J, Henneberg SW, Walther-Larsen S, Kjeldsen C. Tetracaine gel vs. EMLA cream for percutaneous anesthesia in children. Br J Anesth. 1999; 82(4):637-8.

McCafferty DF, Woolfson AD, Handley J, Allen G. Effect of percutaneous local anesthetics on pain reduction during pulse dye laser treatment of port wine stains. Br J Anesth. 1997;78(3):286-9.

Taddio A, Hogan ME, Moyer P, Girgis A, Gerges S, Wang L, et al. Evaluation of the Reliability, validity and practicality of 3 measures of acute pain in infants undergoing Immunization injections. Vaccine. 2011; 29(7):1390-6.

Arendts G, Stevens M, Fry M. Topical anaesthesia and intravenous cannulation success in Pediatric patients: a randomized double-blind trial. Br J Anesth. 2008; 100(4):521-4.

Sawyer J, Febbraro S, Masud S, Ashburn MA, Campbell JC. Heated lidocaine/tetracaine Patch (Synera™, Rapydan™) compared with lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA®) for topical anaesthesia before vascular access. Br J Anesth. 2009; 102(2):210-5.