DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20205501

Evaluation of outcome of early appendectomy in appendicular lump

A. S. M. Rezbanul Haque, Bablu Kumar Saha, M. Mahfuzul Haque, M. Abdus Sattar, Upendra Nath Ray, M. Anisur Rahman, Most Arifa Begum, Miratul Jesmin, Shamima Najma, M. Golam Shorwer

Abstract


Background: Appendicular lump is a well-known sequalae of acute appendicitis encountered in 2-6% of patients. Successful management of appendicular lump is controversial with different approaches. This study aims to evaluate the outcome of early appendectomy in an appendicular lump.

Methods: A total of 210 patients were admitted in surgery and pediatric surgery department of Rangpur medical college and hospital with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and its sequalae over two years.

Results: In this study, sixty patients were included who were presented with an appendicular lump. Maximum patients (50%) were found in the age group of 21-30 years. Males (66.67%) were more affected. Eighty percent of patients were coming from below-average socio-economic conditions. In group I, early appendicectomy had done and outcomes were satisfactory and favorable. In group II, eighteen patients were operated who were admitted at 6 to 8 days after an attack of acute appendicitis, and twelve patients were continued the conservative treatment. In group II, who had done surgery, among them, fourteen patients (77.78%) were found an appendicular abscess, and four patients (22.22%) were found perforated appendix per-operatively. In group I, the mean recovery period was less and they had minimum complications. In group II, the mean recovery period was more and they had more complications.

Conclusions: Based on these findings, it can be concluded that early exploration in appendicular lump patients confirm the diagnosis, cures the problem, reduces the cost of management, and shortens the convalescence period and hospital stay with reasonably satisfactory outcomes.


Keywords


Acute appendicitis, Appendicular lump, Conservative management, Appendicectomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arshad M, Aziz LA, Qasim M, Talpur KA. Early appendectomy in appendicular mass. A Liaquat university hospital experience. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008;20(1):70-2.

Malik AM, Shaikh NA. Recent trends in the treatment of the appendicular mass. In: Dr. Anthony Lander, eds. Appendicitis: a Collection of Essays Form Around the World. 1st ed. Europe and China: In Tech Europe and China. 2012:87-95.

Patel BJ, Patel KH. A comparative study of appendicular lump management. Int Surg J. 2015;2(2):235-8.

Pandey C, Kesharwani R, Chauhan C, Pandey M, Mittra P, Kumar P et al. Management of Appendicular Lump: Early Exploration Vs Conservative Management. Int J Med Sci Pub Health. 2013;2(4):1067-70.

De U, Ghosh S. Acute appendectomy for appendicular mass. A study of 87 patients. Ceylon Med J. 2002;47(4):117-8.

Garba ES, Ahmed A. Management of appendiceal mass. Ann Afr Med. 2008;7(4):200-4.

Tingstedt B, Bexe-Lindskog F, Ekelund M, Anderson R. management of appendiceal masses. Eur J Surg. 2002;168(11):579-82.

Okafor PL, Orakwe JC, Chianakawana GU. Management of appendiceal mass in a peripheral hospital in Nigeria: review of thirty cases. World J Surg. 2003;27(7):800-3.

Jordan JS, Kovalcik PJ, Schwab CW. Appendicitis with a palpable mass. Ann Surg. 1981;193:227-9.

Choudhry ZA, Syed AS, Mishra P. Early exploration of appendicular mass. Pak J Surg. 1996;12(2):64-6.

Pradeep G, Bal KD, Anand RB, Chitkara N. Comparative evaluation of conservative management versus early surgical intervention in appendicular mass. A clinical study. J Indian Med Asso. 1997;95:179-80.

Taj MH, Qureshi SA. Early surgical management of appendicular mass. J Surg Park. 2006;11(2):52-6.

Foran B, Berne TV, Rosoff L. Management of appendiceal mass. Arch Surg. 1978;113:1144-5.

William RCN, Whitelaw DE. Appendicular mass or phlegmon. In: William RCN, Whitelaw DE, eds. General Surgical Operations. 1st ed. UK: Elsevier Books. 2006;111:37

Sardar Ali, Rafique HM. Early exploration versus conservative management. Professional Med J 2010;17(2):180-4.

Kim JK, Ryoos S, Oh HK, Kim JS, Shin R, Choe EK et al. Management of appendicitis with abscess or mass. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(6):413-9.

Kumar S, Jain S. Treatment of appendiceal mass: Prospective randomized control trial. Indian J Gastro Enterol. 2004;23(5):165-7.

Hanif MS, Tahir TH, Sheikh IA, Ranjha MZ. Acute appendicitis: gaining time in mass casualty scenario. Pak Armed Forces J Med. 2010;3:23-5.

Adala SA. Appendiceal mass: Interval appendectomy should not be the rule. Br J Clin Prac. 1996;50:16.

Garg P, Dass BK, Bansaal AR, Chitkara N. comparative evaluation of conservative management versus early surgical intervention in appendicular mass- A clinical study. J Indian Med Assoc. 1997;95(6):179-80.

Dixon MR, Hauoos JS, Park IU. An assessment of the severity of recurrent appendicitis. Am J Surg. 2003;186:718-22.

Friedell ML, Perez-Izquierdo M. Is there a role for interval appendectomy in the management of acute appendicitis? Am Surg. 2000;68:1158-62.

Price MR, Hasse GM, Satorelli KH, Meagher DP Jr. Recurrent appendicitis after initial conservative treatment of appendiceal abscess. J paediatr Surg. 1996;31:291-4.

Samuel M, Hosie G, Holmes K. Prospective evaluation of nonsurgical versus surgical management of appendiceal mass. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:882-6.

Pandey CP, Kesharwani RC, Chauhan CG, Pandey MK, Mittra P, Kumar P et al. Management of appendicular lump: early exploration vs. conservative management. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2013;2:1067-70.

Meshikhes AW. Management of appendiceal mass: controversial issues revisited. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:767-75.

Williams NS, Christopher JK, Bulstrode, O’Connell PR. International Students Edition. Baileys and Love’s. Short Practice of Surgery. 26th edition. London. Edward Arnold Publisher Ltd. 2012;71:1199-212.