Body mass index values for term newborns and its correlation with other anthropometric surrogates


  • Rugmini Kamalammal Department of Pediatrics, Adichuchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B G Nagara, Mandya, Karnataka, India
  • Soorya Rao Department of ENT, Adichuchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B G Nagara, Mandya, Karnataka, India
  • P. J. Parameaswari Biostatistician, Crea Conceptions Counselling and Training Center, Center for Assisted Reproduction, Habibullah Road, T Nagar, Chennai, India



Body mass index, Birth weight, Anthropometric surrogates


Background: Body mass index is a better tool as it relates two anthropometric measures - Weight and Length. This study aims at identifying the mean BMI in term new-borns in Asian population and also the correlation between BMI and other anthropometric surrogates for birth weight.

Methods: Cross Sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital by taking anthropometric measurements for 339 consecutive term newborns, born in the institution. Mean BMI was 11.784 ±1.7. Moderate Positive correlation was observed between BMI and Mid Arm Circumference (r= +0.401; P=0.000).

Results: The cut off value for BMI to identify LBW was 13. Mid Arm Circumference, Chest circumference and Head circumference correlated well with BMI.

Conclusions: By trial and error method of analysis we recommend BMI value of 13 as a cut off for identifying low birth weight infants. BMI is seen to be better than Birth weight in assessing body proportion of a new born.


Blanc AK, Wardlow T. Monitoring low birth weight: an evaluation of international estimates and an update estimation procedure. Bull world heal organization. 2005;83:178-85.

UNICEF: Progress for children. A report card on nutrition. 2006;4:10-1.

Caiza SME, Díaz RJL, Simini F. Ponderal index to describe a term neonatal population. An Pediatr (Barc). 2003;59:48-53.

Use of a Simple Anthropometric Measurement to Predict Birth Weight. Academic journal article. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1993;71(2):157-63.

Kaur H, Bansal R .Anthropometric determinants of low birth weight in newborns of Hoshiarpur district (Punjab) - A hospital based study. Human Biology Review. 2012;1(4):376-86.

Figueira BBD, Segre CAM. Mid-arm circumference and mid-arm/head circumference ratio in term newborns. Sao Paulo Med J. 2004;122(2):53-9.

Das JC, Afroze A, Khanam ST, Paul N. Mid-arm circumference: an alternative measure for screening low birth weight babies. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2005;31:1-6.

Bindu NR, Elizabeth KE, Geetha S, Sarath V. Mid Arm Circumference (MAC) and Body Mass Index (BMI) - The Two Important Auxologic Parameters in Neonates . Journal of Tropical Pediatrics. 2006;52(5):341-5.

Kadam YR, Somaiya P, Kakade SV. A Study of Surrogate Parameters of Birth Weight. Indian J Community Med. 2005;30:89-91.

Rustagi N, Prasuna JG, Taneja DK. Anthropometric surrogates for screening of low birth weight newborns: a community-based study. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2012;24(2):343-51.

Sreeramareddy CT, Chuni N, Patil R, Singh D, Shakya B. Anthropometric surrogates to identify low birth weight Nepalese newborns: a hospital-based study. BMC Pediatrics. 2008;8:16.

Elizabeth NL, Christopher OG, Patrick K. Determining an anthropometric surrogate measure for identifying low birth weight babies in Uganda: a hospital-based cross sectional study. BMC Pediatrics. 2013;13:54.

Kapoor SK, Kumar G, Anand K. Use of mid-arm and chest circumferences to predict birth weight in rural north India. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996;50(6):683-6.

Naik DB, Kulkarni AP, Aswar NR. Birth weight and anthropometry of newborns. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2003;70(2):145-6.

Brock RS, Falcão MC, Leone C. Body mass index values for newborns according to gestational age. Nutr Hosp. 2008;23(5):487-92.






Original Research Articles