Neonatal mid upper arm circumference as surrogate of birth weight

Authors

  • Ankit Agrawal Department of Pediatrics, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Ajay Gaur Department of Pediatrics, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Ravi Ambey Department of Pediatrics, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20200490

Keywords:

Birth weight, Mid upper arm circumference, Newborns, Special newborn care units

Abstract

Background: Recording an accurate birth weight by primary health worker has been a problem in rural areas, leading to search for an alternative, inexpensive, age independent and noninvasive method to predict newborn birth weight and wellbeing. With this background I aimed to found out whether the neonatal-MUAC is associated with birth weight or not?

Methods: This hospital based prospective observational study was conducted in SNCU and postnatal ward, Kamla Raja Hospital, G.R. Medical College, and Gwalior (M.P). A total of 1303 newborns were included in the study. The Mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) of newborns were taken and Birth weight recorded were filled in a proforma.

Results: Total 1303 neonates were evaluated. The mean MUAC and birth weight in preterm was found to be 1854.80±387.3 and 7.47±0.9 as compared to full term newborn having mean birth weight(2818.95±328.1) and mean MUAC (9.58+0.7).The Pearson coefficient of correlation between neonatal MUAC (N-MUAC) and birth weight was found to be r= 0.987 and p<0.01. Birth weight can be predicted from regression equation: Birth weight (gms)=422.99 (N-MUAC) + (-1272.66). Cut-off value of neonatal mid upper arm circumference (N-MUAC) was found to be 8.85cm to predict low birth weight newborn.

Conclusions: Birth weight of newborn can be predicted from neonatal mid upper arm circumference (N-MUAC) in areas where the conventional scale are not easily available for measuring the birth weight of newborn.

References

Howson CP, Kinney MV, Lawn JE. March of Dimes, PMNCH, Save the children, WHO. Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2012.

National Family Health Survey. Fact sheet: India, 2015-2016. Available at: http:// rchiips.org/ NFHS/Factsheet_NFHS-4. Accessed 13 December 2019.

Wardlaw TM, editor. Low birthweight: country, regional and global estimates. UNICEF; 2004.

Annual Health Survey. Fact sheet: Census of India, 2012-2013. Available at: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/vital statistics/AHS bulletin/AHS_Facts. Accessed 13 December 2019.

Taufiq MA, Madjid DA, Lisal JS, Daud D. Relationship between newborn mid-upper-arm circumference and birth weight. Paediatr Indonesiana. 2009 Mar 1;49(1):11-4.

Sauerborn R, Ouiminga RM, Koné B, Sama R, Oepen C, Ebrahim GJ. Neonatal mid-upper-arm circumference is a valid proxy for birth-weight. Trop Med Parasitol. 1990;41(1):65-7.

Ramaiya C, Msamanga G, Massawe S, Mpanju W, Ngwalle E. Newborn's arm circumference as a screening tool of low birth weight in Temeke District, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Trop Geogr Med. 1994;46(5):318-21.

Figueira BB, Segre CA. Mid arm circumference and mid arm/head circumference ratio in term newborn. Sao Paulo Med J. 2004;122:53-9.

Sood SL, Saiprasad GS, Wilson CG. Mid arm circumference at birth: A screening method of detection of low birthweight. Indian Paediatr. 2002; 39:838-42.

Kumar V, Tikkas R, Ramteke S, Shrivastava J. Assessment of gestational age using anthropometric parameter: an observational study in India. Int J Pediatr. 2017;4(11):672-80.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-25

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles