DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20161042

A study on incidence of congenital anomalies in newborns and their association with maternal factors: a prospective study

Rekha Thaddanee, Hemant S. Patel, Nilesh Thakor

Abstract


Background: Congenital malformation represents defects in morphogenesis during early fetal life. Congenital anomalies account for 8–15% of perinatal deaths and 13-16% of neonatal deaths in India. The objective was to study incidence of clinically detectable congenital malformations in newborns delivered at a tertiary hospital and their association with maternal factors.

Methods: The present study is a prospective study of all the newborns delivered at Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, GMERS Medical College, Dharpur-Patan, Gujarat, India for a period of three years from 1st January 2013 to 31st December 2015. Total 2760 consecutive births including both live born babies and still born babies were examined after taking verbal and written consent of their mothers for a visible structural anomalies to determine the overall incidence of congenital malformations and their association with maternal factors. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS software (trial version).

Results: A total of 2760 babies were born out of which 38 were twins. Total numbers of malformed babies were 34, so total point incidence of congenital anomalies turned out to be 1.23%. Out of total 2722 mothers 1815 (66.7%) were in the age group of 21-35 years and out of them 30 (1.70%) malformed babies were born. 167 (6.13%) mothers had consanguineous marriage and out of them 5 (2.99%) had malformed babies. 9 (0.33%) mothers had previous malformed child and out of them 3 mothers gave birth of 3 (33.33%) malformed babies. 397 (14.58%) mothers had history of previous abortion and out of them 10 (2.51%) had malformed babies. 151 (5.54%) mothers had severe anemia and out of them 09 (5.90%) had malformed babies.

Conclusions: From present study it has been concluded that congenital anomalies in newborns were significantly associated with maternal factors like maternal age, consanguinity, previous child with malformation, history of previous abortion and severe anemia.


Keywords


Congenital anomalies, Congenital malformations, Still births, Birth defects, Maternal factors

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agarwal SS, Singh U, Singh PS. Prevalence and spectrum of congenital malformations in a prospective study at a teaching hospital, Indian journal of medical research. 1991;94:413-9.

Patel ZM, Adhia RA. Birth defects surveillance study. Indian J Pediatr. 2005;72:489-91.

Chaturvedi P, Banerjee KS. Spectrum of congenital

malformations in newborns from rural Maharashtra. Indian J Pediatr. 1989;56:501-7.

Datta V, Chaturvedi P. Congenital malformations in rural maharastra , Indian paediatrics. 2000;37:998-1001.

Khanna MP, Prasad LS. Congenital malformations in the newborn. Indian journal of paediatrics. 1967;230:63-71.

Swain S, Agarwal A, Bhatia BD. Congenital malformations at birth. Indian paediatrics. 1994;31:1187-91.

Singh M. Hospital based data on perinatal and neonatal mortality in India, Indian paediatrics. 1986;23:579-84.

Geschwind SA, Stolwijk JAJ. Risk of congenital malformations associated with proximity to hazardous waste sites. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135:1197-207.

Taksande A, Vilhekar K, Chaturvedi P, Jain M. Congenital malformation at birth in central India, Indian journal of human genetics. 2010;16:159-63.

Anand JS, Javadekar BB, Belani M. Congenital malformations in 2000 consecutive births. Indian Pediatr. 1988;25:845-51.

Kalra A, Kalra K, Sharma V. Congenital malformations, Indian paediatrics. 1984;21:945-9.

Desai N, Desai A. Congenital anomalies, a prospective study at Bombay hospital, Bombay hospital journal. 2006;48:442-5.

Saifullah S, Chandra RK, Pathak IC. Congenital malformation in newborn. Indian paediatrics. 1967;4:251-60.

Sagunabai NS, Mascarena M, Syamalan K. An etiological study of congenital malformation in the new born, Indian paediatrics. 1982;19:1003-7.

Yang Q, Wen SW, Leader A. Paternal age and birth defects: how strong is the association? Hum Reprod. 2007;22:696-701.

Ridgely Fisk Green, Krista S. Association of paternal age and risk for major congenital anomalies from the national birth defect prevention study, 1997-2004, Ann Epidemiol. 2010;20(3):241-9.