Evaluation of the WHO/UNICEF algorithm for integrated management of childhood illness

Authors

  • Javaid Iqbal Department of Paediatrics, GMC Jammu, J and K, India
  • Tarsem Lal Motten Department of Orthopaedics, SKIMS Medical College, Bemina, Srinagar, J and K, India
  • Ashu Jamwal Department of Paediatrics, GMC Jammu, J and K, India
  • Pallvi Sharma Department of Paediatrics, GMC Jammu, J and K, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20191541

Keywords:

Children, Gold standard, IMCI, WHO/UNICEF algorithm

Abstract

Background: The present study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and utility of the integrated management of the childhood illness (IMCI) algorithm to diagnose the illnesses in children under the age of 2 months to 5 years.

Methods: The study was conducted on 300 children, aged 2 months to 5 years, who presented with a fresh episode of any illness to the out-patient Department of the SMGS Hospital over a period of 9 months. Within these initial selection criteria, the WHO/UNICEF algorithm for management of the sick child was referred to, children were assessed and classified as per "IMCI" algorithm and treatments required were identified. The final diagnosis was made and appropriate therapy instituted served as the "Gold standard". The diagnostic and therapeutic agreements between the 'gold standard' and the IMCI and vertical (on the basis of primary presenting complaint) algorithms were computed.

Results: Among all 300 subjects, more than one illness was present in 207 (69%) of subjects as per Gold standard diagnosis. The corresponding, figures for IMCI module were 141 (47%) and 222 (74%) for low and high malaria algorithms respectively. The mean illnesses per child were 2.12, 182 and 2.21, respectively. The subjects who would have been referred as per IMCI module had a greater co-existence of illnesses than those who would not have been referred (mean 2.5 versus 1.5 illnesses per child respectively). The specificity for general danger signs was 66% while the sensitivity was 71%.

Conclusions: In conclusion, the performance of the IMCI algorithm is significantly better than the vertical disease specific algorithm. In addition, the IMCI algorithm incorporates an element of preventive care in the form of immunization and feeding advice.

References

Garenne M, Ronsmans C, Campbell H. The magnitude of mortality from acute respiratory infections in children under 5 years in developing countries. World Health Statistics. 1992;45:180-90.

Gove S. Integrated management of children illness by out-patient health workers: Teehnied basis and over view. Bull WHO. 1997;75(1):7-24.

World Health Organization, Division of Diarrhoeal and Acute Respiratory Disease Control. Integrated management of the sickchild. Bull WHO 1995;73:735-40.

Dua T, Narain S. Integrated management of childhood illness. In: Gupte S, ed. Recent Advances in Pediatrics (Special Vol J Community Pediatrics). New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers; 2002:110-112.

Gupte S. Pediatrics in the 2Ist century: Perspectives for the developing countries. In: The Short Textbook of Pediatrics. 9th edn. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers; 2001:1-15.

Sazawal S, Black RE. Meta-analysis of intervention trial on case- management of pneumonia in community settings. Lancet. 1992;340:528-33.

WHO Division of Child Health and Development. Integrated management of childhood illness. Bull WHO. 1997;75(1):119-28.

Pelletier DL, Frongillo EA, Habicht JP. Epidemiologic evidence for a potentiating effect of malnutrition on child mortality. American J Public Health. 1993;83:1130-3.

Shah D, Sachdev HP. Evaluation of the WHO/UNICEF algorithm for integrated management of childhood illness between the age of two months to five years. Indian Pediatr. 1999;36(8):767-77.

Simoes EAF, Desta T, Tessema T, Gertresellassie 1, Dagnew M, Gove S. Performance of health workers after training in integratedmanagement of childhood illness in Gondar, Ethiopia. Bull WHO. 1997;75(1):43-53.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-30

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles