DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20191022

A study of gross congenital malformation at birth

Pooja R. Gandhi, Hetal D. Vora, Halak J. Vasavada, Mehul T. Patelia, Pragneshkumar L. Popatiya, Naznin Vora

Abstract


Background: A congenital anomaly is a structural anomaly of any type that is present at birth. Congenital anomalies may be induced by genetic or environmental factors. Most congenital anomalies, however, show the familial patterns expected of multi-factorial inheritance. The aims and objective of this study were to study the incidence of visible congenital malformations at birth, to study risk factors, to find associated internal malformations.

Methods: It is a retrospective cross-sectional study carried out in a tertiary care hospital affiliated to a medical college. The Inclusion criteria include all new-borns delivered in the hospital with visible congenital malformations examined within 48 hours of birth. Extramural babies were included if they had presented within 48 hours after birth. The Exclusion criteria include still births were excluded from the study.

Results: Percentage of congenital malformation was 1.32%. Most common systems involved were musculoskeletal system (46.34%) followed by genitourinary system (21.34%) and gastrointestinal system (14.02%).

Conclusions: All Babies with gross congenital malformation should be screened for internal malformation. The incidence of CNS malformation has reduced than observed in previous studies which suggest awareness about antenatal folic acid supplementation. Other than CNS anomalies, other system anomalies were not diagnosed antenatally despite antenatal ultrasound being done in maximum number of mothers, which suggest use of 3D or 4D scan antenatally.


Keywords


Antenatal scan, Gross congenital malformation, New born

Full Text:

PDF

References


World Health Organisation. Management of birth defects and haemoglobin disorders: Report of a Joint WHO-March of Dimes meeting. Geneva, Switzerland, Geneva: WHO;2006.

Sharma R. Birth defects in India: Hidden truth, need for urgent attention. Indian J Human Genet. 2013;19(2):125.

Carlos A. Bacino. “Common Genetic Problems in the Newborn”: ch 10, Manual of Neonatal Care, Cloherty JP, eds. 17th ed. 111-123.

Anne Slavotinek eds. “Dysmorphology”: ch 108, Nelson textbook of paediatrics. First South Asia edition. 1: 899-909.

Daryl A. Scott and Brendan Lee,eds “Patterns of genetic transmission” : ch 80 , Nelson textbook of paediatrics; first South Asia edition. 1: 593-604.

World Health Organization. Section on congenital anomalies. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs370/e/.

Sarkar S, Patra C, Dasgupta MK, Nayek K, Karmakar PR. Prevalence of congenital anomalies in neonates and associated risk factors in a tertiary care hospital in eastern India. J Clinic Neonatol. 2013;2(3):131.

Vinodh SL, Balakrishnan D. “Pattern of congenital anomalies in a tertiary care centre. J Med Sci Clinic Res.2017; 05 (01).

Singh A, Gupta RK. Pattern of congenital anomalies in newborn: a hospital based prospective study. JK Sci. 2009;11(1).

Maternal and child health bureau. Child health USA 2013. Available at: https://mchb.hrsa.gov.

Sachdeva S, Nanda S, Bhalla K, Sachdeva R. Gross congenital malformation at birth in a government hospital. 2014:58(1).

Pandya M, Thakkar J. Study of gross congenital malformations in new born. 2013:2(27).