Outcomes of early surgical management of complicated appendicitis in children


  • Pramod S. Department of Paediatric Surgery, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • B. Revanth Kumar Department of Surgery, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka, India




Appendectomy, Complicated appendicitis, Fecolith


Background: Appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in children. Nearly 30% of children present with complicated appendicitis. Controversy exists between early or delayed surgery in complicated appendicitis. Present study was done to evaluate the outcome of early surgical management of complicated appendicitis in children and also to analyze risk factors for complicated appendicitis.

Methods: A retrospective observational study conducted by the department of Paediatric Surgery, KIMS, hospital Bangalore. All children with complicated appendicitis (perforated, gangrenous and mass) from October 2014 to October 2017 were included in the study. Clinical, biochemical and imaging findings of these children were tabulated. Children underwent either open or laparoscopic appendectomy. Intra operative data regarding the type of complication, presence or absence of Fecolith, position of appendix was documented. Post operatively duration of stay and complications were analyzed.

Results: 47 children were included in the study. Mean age of presentation was 10.38±2.84 years. Most common presentation was pain abdomen. 65% of the patient had pain abdomen for duration of three days or more. Total leucocyte count of more than 15000 was seen in about 50% of the children. 68% of children underwent laparotomy, 23.5% underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. Intra operatively, perforation of the appendix with generalized peritonitis was the commonest finding. Fecolith was present in 32% of the cases. Mean duration of stay was 7.46 days. Wound infection was seen in 15% of the children. Late complication in the form of adhesive obstruction was seen in 5 patients.

Conclusions: Complicated appendicitis is associated with high morbidity. High leucocyte count, delayed presentation and Fecolith are possible indicators of complicated appendicitis. Early surgery in complicated appendicitis is safe, feasible. The complication rate is acceptable and most of them can be managed conservatively. Hence early surgery in complicated appendicitis is an option to be considered.


Rothrock SG, Pagane J. Acute appendicitis in children: Emergency department diagnosis and management. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;36:39-51.

Ponsky TA, Huang ZJ, Kittle K. Hospital- and patient-level characteristics and the risk of appendiceal rupture and negative appendectomy in children. JAMA. 2004;292(16):1977-82.

Anderson JE, Bickler SW, Chang DC, Talamini MA. Examining a common disease with unknown etiology: trends in epidemiology and surgical management of appendicitis in California, 1995-2009. World J Surg. 2012;36(12):2787-94.

Andersen BR, Kallehave FL, Andersen HK. Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendicectomy. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2005;3.

Simillis C, Symeonides P, Shorthouse AJ, Tekkis PP. A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surg. 2010;147(6):818-29.

Nance ML, Adamson WT, Hedrick HL. Appendicitis in the young child: a continuing diagnostic challenge. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2000;16:160-2.

Cueto J, D’Allemagne B, Vázquez-Frias JA, Gomez S, Delgado F, Trullenque L, et al. Morbidity of laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis: an international study. Surgical Endoscop. 2006;20(5):717-20.

Santacroce L, Geibel J, Ochoa JB, Hines OJ, Talavera F. Appendectomy. Medscape. 2017. Available at http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/195778-overview 2011

Janik JS, Ein SH, Shandling B. Nonsurgical management of appendiceal mass in late presenting children. J Pediatr Surg. 1980;15(4):574-6.

Cappendijk VC, Hazebroek FW. The impact of diagnostic delay on the course of acute appendicitis. Arch Dis Child. 2000;83:64-6.

Barreto SG, Travers E, Thomas T, Mackillop C, Tiong L, Lorimer M, et al. Acute perforated appendicitis: An analysis of risk factors to guide surgical decision making. Indian J Med Sci. 2010;64:58-65.

Smink DS, Fishman SJ, Kleinman K, Finkelstein JA. Effects of race, insurance status, and hospital volume on perforated appendicitis in children. Pediatr. 2005;115:920-5.

Yardeni D, Hirschl RB, Drongowski RA, Teitelbaum DH, Geiger JD, Coran AG. Delayed versus immediate surgery in acute appendicitis: Do we need to operate during the night? J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39:464-9.

Bickell NA, Aufses AH Jr, Rojas M, Bodian C. How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:401-6.

Pasha G, Khorasani B. Effects of two new risk factors on perforated and non-perforated appendicitis. Res J Biol Sci. 2009;4:1175-9.

Ashcraft KW, Holcomb III GW, Murphy JP, editors. Ashcraft's Paediatric Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2010:549.

Augustin T, Cagir B, Vandermeer TJ. Characteristics of perforated appendicitis: Effect of delay is confounded by age and gender. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:1223-31.

Guy PJ, Pailthorpe CA. The radio-opaque appendicolith: its significance in clinical practice. J R Army Med Corps. 1983;129:163-6.

Aljefri A, Al-Nakshabandi N. The stranded stone: Relationship between acute appendicitis and appendicolith. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:258-60

Sanapathi PSP, Bhattacharya D, Amori BJ. Early laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicular mass. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(12):1783e5.

Garg P, Dass BK, Bansal AR, Chitkara N. Comparative evaluation of conservative management versus early surgical intervention in appendicular massda clinical study. J Indian Med Assoc. 1997;95(6):179e80

Malik A, Laghari AA, Mallah Q, Hussain A, Talpur K. Earlynappendicectomy in appendicular mass dA LIAQUAT University hospital experience. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008;20(1).

Ghosh S, De U. Acute appendicectomy for appendicular mass: a study of 87 patients. Ceylon Med J. 2002;47(4):117e8.

Samuel M, Hosie G, Holmes K. Prospective evaluation of nonsurgical versus surgical management of appendiceal mass. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37(6):882e6.

Bufo AJ, Shah RS, Li MH. Interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1998;8(4):209-14.

Oliak D, Yamini D, Udani VM. Nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis without periappendiceal mass. Am J Surg. 2000;179(3):177-81

Pearl RH, Hale DA, Molloy M, Schutt DC, Jaques DP. Pediatric appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30(2):173-81.

Henry MC, Walker A, Silverman BL. Risk factors for the development of abdominal abscesses following operation for perforated appendicitis in children: a multicenter case-control study. Arch Surg. 2007;142(3):236-41.






Original Research Articles