Evaluation of laboratory markers of sepsis screen in the diagnosis of early onset neonatal septicemia

Authors

  • Zeeba Zaka-ur-Rab Department of Pediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, A.M.U., Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh
  • Monika Kar Department of Pediatrics, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, S.R.H.U., Dehradun, Uttarakhand
  • Veena Gupta Department of Pediatrics, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, S.R.H.U., Dehradun, Uttarakhand
  • Brahm P. Kalra Department of Pediatrics, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, S.R.H.U., Dehradun, Uttarakhand
  • Kafil Akhtar Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, A.M.U., Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20163146

Keywords:

Neonate, Sepsis screen, Septicemia

Abstract

Background:In the absence of accessibility to more recent, sophisticated techniques for early detection of neonatal sepsis, most neonatal health care facilities are forced to still rely on various routinely available hematological markers. However, reports on the diagnostic utility of these markers in the septic screen are rather conflicting. Aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of routinely available laboratory markers of sepsis screen, and their combinations in diagnosis of early onset neonatal septicemia (EOS).

Methods: This prospective, hospital based, cross-sectional study was performed in the Department of Pediatrics of two Tertiary Care Teaching Hospitals, North India. The study involved term neonates admitted with either suspected EOS/ risk factors for sepsis in neonatal ICU, post-natal ward, or the pediatric ward. Control group comprised apparently healthy neonates without risk factors for sepsis. Blood cultures and sepsis screen were performed in all babies at enrollment.

Results:The study group included 161 babies. Of these, 56 (34.78%) were blood culture positive. Control group comprised 102 neonates. Sepsis screen was positive in 69.57% subjects with clinically suspected sepsis, 83.93% cases of true sepsis, and 54.92% controls. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of sepsis screen were 83.93%, 35.29%, 41.59% and 80.00%, respectively. Amongst individual markers of sepsis screen, CRP had best diagnostic utility with highest sensitivity (82.14%), specificity (89.22%), PPV (80.70%), NPV (90.10%), and LR+ (7.62), and the lowest LR- (0.20). The combination of CRP plus I/T had the highest sensitivity (78.57%), specificity (100%), PPV (100%) and NPV (89.47%), and the lowest LR- (0.21) amongst all other 2 marker combinations.

Conclusions:Combination of CRP plus I/T can serve as a reliable and useful tool for rapid diagnosis of EOS in term neonates. However, all other two test combinations do not have requisite high sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value.  

References

Ghosh S, Mittal M, Jaganathan G. Early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis using a hematological scoring system. Indian J Med Sci. 2001;55:495-500.

Ng PC. Diagnostic markers of infection in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F229-35.

Rodwell RL, Leslie AL, Tudehope Dl. Early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis using a hematological scoring system. J Pediatr. 1988;112:761-6.

Mishra UK, Jacobs SE, Doyle LW, Garland SM. Newer approaches to the diagnosis of early onset neonatal sepsis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006;91(3):F208-12.

Singh M. Perinatal infections. In: Singh M, ed. Care of Newborn. 6th ed. New Delhi: Sagar Publications, 2004:196-216.

Ng PC, Cheng SH, Chui KM, Fok TF, Wong MY, Wong W, et al. Diagnosis of late onset neonatal sepsis with cytokines, adhesion molecule and C reactive protein in preterm very low birth weight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997;77(3):F221-7.

Sankar MJ, Agarwal R, Deorari AK, Paul VK. Sepsis in the newborn. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75:261-6.

Ng PC, Li K, Wong RP, Chui KM, Wong E, Fok TF. Neutrophil CD64 expression: a sensitive diagnostic marker for late-onset nosocomial infection in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Res. 2002;51(3):296-303.

Kumar A, Singh M, Paul U. Clinical approach to neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Today. 2001;4:493-515.

Da Silva O, Ohlsson A, Kenyon C. Accuracy of leukocyte indices and C-reactive protein for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a critical review. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995;14:362-6.

Manucha V, Rusia U, Sikka M, Faridi MM, Madan N. Utility of haematological parameters and C-reactive protein in the detection of neonatal sepsis. J Paediatr Child Health. 2002;38(5):459-64.

Narasimha A, Harendra Kumar MLH. Significance of

Hematological Scoring System (HSS) in Early Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2011;27(1):14-7.

Majumdar A, Jana A, Jana A, Biswas S, Bhattacharyya S. Hematologic scoring system (HSS): A guide to decide judicious use of antibiotics in neonatal septicemia in developing countries. J Appl Hematol. 2013;4:110-3.

Supreetha MS, Alva SR, Shivendra VS, Kariappa TM. Evaluation of neonatal septicaemia using haematological parameters. Internat J of Recent Sci Res. 2015;6:2775-8.

Makkar M, Gupta C, Pathak R, Garg S, Mahajan NC. Performance evaluation of hematologic scoring system in early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. J Clin Neonatol. 2013;2:25-9.

Varsha, Rusia U, Sikka M, Faridi MM, Madan N. Validity of hematologic parameters in identification of early and late onset neonatal infection. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2003;46:565-8.

Vigushin DM, Pepys MB, Hawkins PN. Metabolic and scintigraphic studies of radioiodinated human C-reactive protein in health and disease. J Clin Invest. 1993; 91:1351–7.

Mathai E, Christopher U, Mathai M, Jana AT, Rose D, Bergstrom S. Is C reactive protein useful in differentiating infected from uninfected neonates among those at risk of infection. Indian J Pediatr. 2004;41:895-9.

Philip AG, Mills PC. Use of C-reactive protein in minimizing antibiotic exposure: experience with infants initially admitted to a well-baby nursery. Pediatrics. 2000;106:E4.

Ainbender E, Cabatu EE, Guzman DM, Sweet AY. Serum C-reactive protein and problems of newborn infants. J Pediatr 1992; 3: 438-42.

Ng PC, Lee CH, Fok TF, Chui K, Wong W, Cheung KL, et al. Central nervous system candidiasis in preterm infants: limited value of biochemical markers for diagnosis. J Paediatr Child Health. 2000;36:509-10.

Sharma A, Kutty CV, Sabharwal U, Rathee S, Mohan H: Evaluation of sepsis screen for diagnosis of neonatal septicemia. Indian J Pediatr. 1993;60:559-63.

Ahmed Z, Ghafoor T, Waqar T, Ali S, Aziz S, Mahmood S. Diagnostic value of C- reactive protein and haematological parameters in neonatal sepsis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005;5(3):152-6.

Chandana A, Rao MN, Srinivas M, Shyamala S. Rapid diagnostic tests in neonatal septicemia. Indian J Pediatr. 1988;55(6):947-53.

Garland SM, Bowman ED. Reappraisal of C-reactive protein as a screening tool for neonatal sepsis. Pathology. 2003;35:240-3.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-22

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles