DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20173716

A study on postnatal evaluation and follow-up of infants with antenatally detected hydronephrosis

Soundaiyan Balasankar, Jeyaraman Balasubramanian

Abstract


Background: Antenatal hydronephrosis(ANH) has now become a frequent diagnosis with the increasing use of antenatal ultrasonography. Objective of present study was to evaluate and follow up infants with antenatally detected hydronephrosis and to determine whether there is significant correlation between anteroposterior renal pelvic diameter detected in antenatal USG and urinary tract anomalies detected postnatally.

Methods: After obtaining an informed consent, all neonates with antenatal ultrasound showing hydronephrosis (n=80) were enrolled in the study. Postnatal ultrasound was done at 3 days ,1 month and 6 months of postnatal life. Atleast 6 months followup was done to look for spontaneous resolution or other significant pathology. Micturating cystourethrography/radionuclide scan done in selected cases.

Results: Out of 80 cases ,43 had mild,24 had moderate and 13 had severe degrees of hydronephrosis.31 of them (9 mild,10 moderate and 12 with severe hydronephrosis) had postnatal anomaly detected.14 of them (1 mild, 4 moderate and 9 with severe hydronephrosis) underwent surgery. As the grade of antenatal hydronephrosis increases from mild, moderate to severe, the relative risk of postnatal anomaly and requirement of surgical intervention also increased (p value<0.0001).

Conclusions: Antenatal hydronephrosis may be associated with significant postnatal urinary tract anomaly with risk quantified by the measurement of anteroposterior renal pelvic diameter(APPD). 


Keywords


Antenatal hydronephrosis, Anteroposterior pelvic diameter

Full Text:

PDF

References


Blyth B, Snyder HM, Duckett JW. Antenatal diagnosis and subsequent management of hydronephrosis. J Urol. 1993;149(4):693-8.

Gunn TR, Mora JD, Pease P. Antenatal diagnosis of urinary tract abnormalities by ultrasonography after 28 weeks gestation: incidence and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:479-86.

Livera LN, Brookfield DS, Egginton JA, Hawnaur JM. Antenatal ultrasonography to detect fetal renal abnormalities: a prospective screening programme. BMJ. 1989;298:1421-3.

Sairam S, Al‐Habib A, Sasson S, Thilaganathan B.. Natural history of fetal hydronephrosis diagnosed on mid-trimester ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;17:191-6.

Lee RS, Cendron M, Kinnamon DD, Nguyen HT. Antenatal hydronephrosis as a predictor of postnatal outcome: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2006;118(2):586-93.

Cheng AM, Phan V, Geary DF, Rosenblum ND. Outcome of isolated antenatal hydronephrosis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:38-40.

Gotoh H, Masuzaki H, Fukuda H, Yoshimura S, Ishimaru T. Detection and assessment of pyelectasis in the fetus: relationship to postnatal renal function. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:226-37.

Hálek J, Flögelová H, Michálková K, Šmakal O, Dubrava L, Zapletalová J,. Diagnostic accuracy of postnatal ultrasound screening for urinary tract abnormalities. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25:281-7.

Bouzada MC, Oliveira EA, Pereira AK, Leite HV, Rodrigues AM, Fagundes LA et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter as a predictor of uropathy: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:745-9.

Nelson text book of Pediatrics: first south Asian edition. Elsevier;2016:2567-68.