DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20174732

Evaluation of Calf circumference as a procedure to screen low birth weight babies: a hospital based cross sectional study

Arshiya Rehman Sheikh, Sushama Subhash Thakre, Subhash Thakre, Chaitanya Rangangouda Patil, Prithvi B. Petkar

Abstract


Background: In spite of the interventions being taken, low birth weight still persists as a public health problem in low and middle-income countries. World Health Organization defines low birth weight as birth weight less than 2500 gm. There is a constant search to find newer methods to detect low birth weight babies so that early methods can be instituted. This study was conducted to evaluate calf circumference as procedure to screen low birth weight babies in tertiary care hospital in Nagpur.

Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted in tertiary care hospital of Nagpur, Maharashtra for a period of 4 months. The study subjects were babies delivered at the hospital. Birth weight was recorded using a digital weighing scale within 24 hours of the delivery. Length, calf circumference, head and chest circumference were measured according to standard guidelines.

Results: Majority of mothers were in the age group of 20 to 24 years of age group, were educated up to primary school and belonged to Hindu religion. The mean calf circumference of low birth weight babies was 9.64±1.13 cm and was 10.96±1.01 cm in normal weight babies. The mean values of calf circumference were significantly lower in low birth weight babies (p <0.001). The sensitivity and specificity for the best cut off of calf circumference was found to be 89.97% and 42.86% respectively.

Conclusions: Measuring calf circumference was found to be a good test with higher sensitivity but lower specificity. Hence, calf circumference can be used as an alternative method to screen babies born in remote areas, where the facility of weighing the baby at birth is not available.


Keywords


Calf circumference, Low birth weight, Newborn

Full Text:

PDF

References


WHO Global nutrition targets 2025: Low Birth Weight Policy Brief. 2012. Available at http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/globaltargets_lowbirthweight_policybrief.pdf

World Health Organisation: Low birth weight fact sheet. Available at www.who.int/whosis/whostat2006NewbornsLowBirthWeight.pdf.

Maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health. Available at http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/topics/newborn/care_of_preterm/en/

Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey Manual 2005: Monitoring the situation of children and women. Available at http://mics.unicef.org/files?job=W1siZiIsIjIwMTUvMDQvMDgvMDgvMjgvNTIvODQ2L01JQ1MzX0NoYXB0ZXJfMF9fX1RpdGxlX1BhZ2VfYW5kX0NvbnRlbnRzLnBkZiJdXQ&sha=9434bf73f759e625

Janani Suraksha Yojana. Available at https://www.nhp.gov.in/janani-suraksha-yojana-jsy-_pg

Thind A, Mohani A, Banerjee K, Hagigi F. Where to deliver? Analysis of choice of delivery location from a national survey in India. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:29.

Das S, Bapat U, More NS, Chordhekar L, Joshi W, Osrin D. Prospective study of determinants and costs of home births in Mumbai slums. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:38.

Devasenapathy N, George MS, Jerath GS, Singh A, Negandhi H, Alagh G, et al. Why women choose to give birth at home: a situational analysis from urban slums of Delhi. BMJ Open. 2014;4(5): e004401.

Maternal of newborn disparities in India. Available at https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/country_profiles/India/country profile_IND.pdf

Sunilkumar P, Sudarshan K, Kumari V. A comparative study of calf circumference with other anthropometric measurements to measure low birth weight babies at risk: a hospital based study. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2013;2(12):1958-65.

Suneetha B, Kavitha VK. A Study of relationship between birthweight and various anthropometric parameters in neonates. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2016;15(2):50-7.

Kakrani V, Holambe V, Garad S, Gupte A. Alternative predictors of low birth weight. Indian J Prev Soc Med. 2008;39(3):161-4.

Taksande A, Vilhekar KY, Chaturvedi P, Gupta S, Deshmukh P, Able T. Predictor of low birth weight babies by anthropometry. J Trop Pediatr. 2007;53(6):421-3.

Kulkarni Y. Comparison of various anthropometric parameters as predictors of the birth weight in newborns. Int J Sci Res. 2016;5(3):728-30.

Kaur M, Singh Z, Kaur G, Goyal LD. Correlation of birth weight with other anthropometric measurements of newborns. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res. 2013;8(2):870-9.

Jyothi S, Gopal K. Utility of anthropometric measurements to predict low birth weight newborns. Int J Pediatr Res. 2016;3(11):781-91.

Kusharisupeni, Putra WKY, Achmad EK. Anthropometric measurements for detecting low birth weight. Paediatr Indones. 2013;53(3):177-80.

Das J, Khanam S, Afroze A, Paul N. Comparative evaluation of anthropometric parameters in detecting low birth weight infants. Ulutas Med J. 2015;1(1):10-5.

Taksande AM, Lakhkar B, Gadekar A. Anthropometric measurements of term neonates in tertiary care hospital of Wardha district. Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2015;8(2):140-3.

Alia RA, Mannan MA, Fatema K, Begum F. Correlation of birth weight with other anthropometric variables in detection of low birth weight (LBW) babies. J Dhaka Natl Med Coll Hos. 2011;17(1):29-32.

Hajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2014;48:193-204.

Indian Standard Classification of Education, 2014. Available at http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/statistics/InSCED2014_0.pd

Distribution of population by religion. Available at censusindia.gov.in/Ad_Campaign/drop_in.../04-Distribution_by_Religion.pdf

WHO. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organization technical report series. 1995:1-452.