A cross sectional study to assess psychological impact of COVID-19 on health care workers in KIMS Bangalore

Authors

  • H. S. Ramya Department of Paediatrics, Kempegowda Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • Keerthidarshini . Department of Paediatrics, Kempegowda Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • Sanjay L. Department of Paediatrics, Kempegowda Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • Afroza Asiya Department of Paediatrics, Kempegowda Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20213309

Keywords:

COVID-19, Pandemic, Stress, Anxiety, Healthcare workers

Abstract

Background: The ongoing coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in substantial psychological stress and anxiety for healthcare workers, we did a study targeting the healthcare workers to assess the magnitude of stress and anxiety in tertiary care centre.

Methods: We conducted a cross sectional survey-based study among 150 healthcare workers working at KIMS hospital, Bangalore from September 2020 to December 2020. Stress and anxiety were investigated using DASS-21 scale, association of stress and anxiety with demographic factors such as age, sex, profession, living with family/alone, past history and family history of any psychiatric illness were analysed using chi-square test.

Results: In 150 participants who were included in the study, 47 were males and 103 were females. Mean age of the subjects was 32.9±8.37 years. The number of married and unmarried subjects were similar in the two groups (79 versus 71). Majority of the subjects were staying with the family (69%) and few were staying alone (31%). 10 were ayahs, 21 ward boys, 14 interns, 59 post graduates, 46 staff nurses were included. 11 subjects gave history of substance abuse in the past (7%). 7 subjects had suffered from psychiatric illness (5%) in the past 4 more had family history of psychiatric illness and the mean score for stress recorded was 17.77±6.4, which was indicative of mild stress. The mean anxiety score was 16.25±6.61 which corresponded to severe anxiety.

Conclusions: In this study of healthcare workers, working in fever clinic, triage, wards and ICUs for patients with COVID-19, subjects reported experiencing stress and anxiety, especially ayahs, staff nurses and mainly female healthcare workers directly engaged in diagnosis, treatment, and care for patients with COVID-19.

Author Biography

H. S. Ramya, Department of Paediatrics, Kempegowda Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Pediatrics 

Post graduate

References

Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020;17(5):1729.

Ministry of Health and family welfare, India (mohfw.gov.in). https://main.mohfw.gov.in/diseasealerts/novel-corona-virus. Accessed on 5th May, 2021.

John’s Hopkins University Coronavirus resource centre. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data. Accessed on 5th May, 2021.

Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA network open. 2020;3(3):e203976.

Holmes EA, O'Connor RC, Perry VH, Tracey I, Wessely S, Arseneault L et al. Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(6):547-60.

Luan R, Pu W, Dai L, Yang R, Wang P. Comparison of Psychological Stress Levels and Associated -Factors Among Healthcare Workers, Frontline Workers, and the General Public During the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2020;11:1368.

Wu X, JIANG X, Yl XK, Li M. Clinical findings in a group of patients infected with the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) outside of Wuhan, China: retrospective case series. BMJ. 2020;368:m606.

Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Swinson RP. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological assessment. 1998;10(2):176.

Oei TP, Sawang S, Goh YW, Mukhtar F. Using the depression anxiety stress scale 21 (DASS‐21) across cultures. International Journal of Psychology. 2013;48(6):1018-29.

Lee AM, Wong JG, McAlonan GM, Cheung V, Cheung C, Sham PC et al. Stress and psychological distress among SARS survivors 1 year after the outbreak. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2007;52(4):233-40.

Cai H, Tu B, Ma J, Chen L, Fu L, Jiang Y et al. Psychological impact and coping strategies of frontline medical staff in Hunan between January and March 2020 during the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hubei, China. Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2020;26:e924171-1.

Xu J, Xu QH, Wang CM, Wang J. Psychological status of surgical staff during the COVID-19 outbreak. Psychiatry research. 2020;288:112955.

Selvaraj P, Muthukanagaraj P, Saluja B, Jeyaraman M, Anudeep TC, Gulati A et al. Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on health-care professionals in India–A multicentric cross-sectional study. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020;72(3):141.

Raj R, Koyalada S, Kumar A, Kumari S, Pani P. Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in India: An observational study. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2020;9(12):5921.

Tan BY, Chew NW, Lee GK, Jing M, Goh Y, Yeo LL et al. Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care workers in Singapore. Annals of internal medicine. 2020;173(4):317-20.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles