Comparative study of efficacy and safety of intravenous sodium valproate with intravenous phenytoin sodium in the treatment of status epilepticus in children

Authors

  • Mohan Kumar N Department of Paediatrics, Kempegowda Institute of Medical sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Manjunatha Babu R Department of Paediatrics, Vydehi Institute of Medical sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Karunakara BP Department of Paediatrics, M S Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20150966

Keywords:

Status epilepticus, IV valproate, IV phenytoin

Abstract

Background: Status Epilepticus (SE) is a common paediatric neurological emergency that requires immediate and aggressive management. The standard treatment of status epilepticus includes use of diazepam, midazolam, phenytoin sodium/phenobarbitone, diazepam infusion in sequential order. Unfortunately the current therapies mentioned above have considerable adverse effects. There was a continued search for alternative drug. We found out that intravenous (IV) sodium valproate is safe and effective in controlling paediatric SE. Objective: Compare efficacy and safety of intravenous sodium valproate with intravenous phenytoin sodium in the treatment of status epilepticus in children.

Methods: This prospective comparative study was done over a period of two years. Children admitted to paediatric intensive care unit who satisfy inclusion criteria were included in the study. Thirty two subjects were enrolled. The subjects were randomized. 17 patients in VPA group received intravenous (IV) valproate in dose of 30 mg/kgas loading dose followed by additional 10 mg/kg if not controlled and fifteen patients in PHT group received intravenous (IV) phenytoin in the doses of 20 mg/kg and an additional 10 mg/kg if not controlled. Children were clinically monitored for adverse events. Treatment was considered successful if seizures were controlled within 20 minutes.  

Results: IV valproate was successful in 82.4% and IV phenytoin in 80% with P>0.05. In a cross over, out of 3 uncontrolled patients in PHT group, none of the children got controlled with VPA as 2nd choice. However in VPA group, out of 3 uncontrolled patients, one got controlled with phenytoin as 2nd choice. Recurrence was 2.5 times more with phenytoin (3/7) than valproate (2/7) with P=0.209.

Conclusions: It was observed that intravenous sodium valproate is as effective as intravenous phenytoin in treatment of paediatric status epilepticus. The drug was tolerated well with no clinically observed adverse effects.

References

Kian-Ti Yu, Sandra Mills, Nanora T. Paediatric status epileptics and acute repetitive seizures. Epilepsia. 2003;44(5):724-6.

Shorvon S. Status epilepticus: its clinical features and treatment in children and adults. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.

Salas-Puig J, Suarez Moro R, Mateos V. Status epilepticus. Neurologia. 1996;11(34):108-21.

Rosenow F, Arzimanoglou A, Baulac M. Recent developments in treatment of status epilepticus: a review. Epileptic Disord. 2002;4(2):S41-51.

Devinsky O, Leppik I, Willmore LJ. Safety of intravenous valproate. Ann Neurol. 1995;38:670-4.

Working Group on Status Epilepticus. Treatment of convulsive SE. Recommendations of the epilepsy foundation of America’s working group on SE. JAMA. 1993;270:854-9.

Knapp L, Kugler A. Clinical experience with fosphenytoin in adults: pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy. J Child Neurol. 1998;13(1):S15-8.

Bernard Rosner. Statistical methods. In: Bernard Rosner, eds. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 5th ed. Duxbury: Duxbury Publisher; 2000: 80-240.

M. Venkataswamy Reddy. Statistical methods. In: M. Venkataswamy Reddy, eds. Statistics for Mental Health Care Research. 4th ed. India: NIMHANS Publication; 2002: 108-144.

Sunder Rao PSS, Richard J. An introduction to biostatistics. A Manual for Students in Health Sciences. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India; 2006: 86-160.

Kathryn L. Weise, Thomas P. Bleck. Status epilepticus in children and adults. Crit Care Clin. 1997;13:629-46.

Shinnar S, Pellock JM, Moshe SL, Maytal J, O’Dell C, Driscoll SM, et al. In whom does status epilepticus occur: age-related differences in children. Epilepsia. 1997;38:907-14.

Chin RF, Neville BG, Peckham C. Incidence, cause, and short-term outcome of convulsive status epilepticus in childhood: prospective population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368:222-9.

Puneet Agarwal, Navneet Kumar, Rakesh Chandra. Randomized study of intravenous valproate and phenytoin in status epilepticus. Seizure. 2007;16:527-32.

Misra UK, Kalita J, Patel R. Sodium valproate vs. phenytoin sodium in status epilepticus: a pilot study. Neurology. 2006;67:340-2.

Leppik IE, Boucher R, Wilder BJ, Murthy VS, Rask CA, Watridge C, et al. Phenytoin prodrug: pre-clinical and clinical studies. Epilepsia. 1989;30(2):S22-6.

VenkataramanV, Wheless JW. Safety of rapid IV valproate loading doses in epilepsy patients. Epilepsy Res. 1999;35(2):147-53.

Wheless JW, Vazquez BR, Kanner AM, Ramsay RE. Rapid infusion with valproate sodium is well tolerated in patients with epilepsy. Neurology. 2004;63(8):1507-8.

Raspall-Chaure M, Chin RF, Neville BG. Outcome of paediatric convulsive status epilepticus: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:769-79.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-04

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles